# | {{ resultText.questionCol }} | {{ resultText.answerCol }} |
---|---|---|
{{ a.id }} | {{ a.text }} | {{ a.answer }} |
Anxiety weaves together physical sensations, racing thoughts, and shifts in behaviour, so gauging its intensity requires looking across body and mind. The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) captures that picture through twenty-one short statements scored on a four-point scale, translating your past-week experience into a clinically recognised severity score.
As you rate each item from “not at all” to “severely,” the inventory records both the total score (0 to 63) and subscores that distinguish somatic sensations (e.g., heart pounding, dizziness) from cognitive worries (e.g., fear of losing control, fear of dying). It also tracks whether panic-like features cluster, helping you understand which parts of anxiety are most active.
For instance, someone who reports muscle tension, racing heart, dizziness, and choking sensations as severe but marks cognitive fears as mild will see a high physical subscore and a balanced or physical-dominant profile. That insight suggests prioritising breath pacing, body-based relaxation, or medical review of physical triggers while still acknowledging thought patterns.
Complete the inventory in a calm setting, reflect on the same seven-day window whenever you repeat it, and note contextual factors such as caffeine, sleep loss, or recent stressors that might inflate scores. Elevated totals signal the need for professional evaluation rather than self-management alone, and even low scores deserve monitoring if new triggers, trauma reminders, or medication changes appear. When worry focuses mostly on thoughts, pair this tool with cognitive screening instruments; when physical symptoms dominate, align it with medical checks to rule out other causes.
The BAI measures the intensity of common anxiety manifestations across seven days, capturing physiological arousal (tingling, trembling, shortness of breath), autonomic sensations (sweating, hot flashes), and cognitive-emotional states (fear, catastrophic thinking). Each item is rated 0 (not at all) to 3 (severely), reflecting how much the symptom bothered the respondent.
The total score T is the sum of all item scores, yielding a 0–63 range. A physical subscore P aggregates 14 items emphasising bodily sensations, while a cognitive subscore C combines 7 items focused on thoughts and fears. Subscores are graded none, mild, moderate, or severe using quartile thresholds relative to their maximums (42 for physical, 21 for cognitive). Pattern analysis labels a profile as physical-dominant, cognitive-dominant, or balanced based on the difference between P and C.
Severity bands follow the standard BAI interpretation: Normal (0–7), Mild (8–15), Moderate (16–25), and Severe (26–63). In addition, the tool checks for panic-like clustering: if two or more of the panic marker items—palpitations, terror, choking, fear of losing control, difficulty breathing, or fear of dying—score 3, a panic flag appears.
The instrument assumes adult respondents, consistent self-awareness across the past week, and the ability to distinguish anxiety symptoms from other medical causes. It does not diagnose anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive presentations, or trauma responses on its own and should be combined with clinical interviews for comprehensive assessment.
Symbol | Meaning | Unit / datatype | Source |
---|---|---|---|
Score for item i (0–3) | integer | Input | |
Total BAI score | 0–63 | Derived | |
Physical subscore (14 items) | 0–42 | Derived | |
Cognitive subscore (7 items) | 0–21 | Derived |
Consider a respondent who marks heart pounding, dizziness, shaky hands, and difficulty breathing as severe (score 3), rates feeling terrified and fear of losing control as moderate (score 2), and marks most other items as mild (score 1). The calculations become:
A total score of 27 falls in the Severe band. The physical subscore (18/42) and cognitive subscore (9/21) both grade as moderate, and the presence of multiple severe panic markers raises the panic flag. That profile suggests pairing professional support with strategies that calm the body, such as slow breathing and gradual exposure.
Band | Score range | Interpretation |
---|---|---|
Normal | 0 to 7 | Minimal anxiety; maintain coping routines and monitor for change. |
Mild | 8 to 15 | Noticeable symptoms; self-help strategies or coaching may suffice. |
Moderate | 16 to 25 | Symptoms affect function; evidence-based therapy is recommended. |
Severe | 26 to 63 | High distress; seek timely evaluation by a mental-health professional. |
Label | Threshold | Meaning |
---|---|---|
None | ≤ 25% of max | Symptoms scarcely present in that domain. |
Mild | ≤ 50% of max | Low intensity; monitor for upward drift. |
Moderate | ≤ 75% of max | Noticeable impact; prioritise coping strategies here. |
Severe | > 75% of max | High burden; seek targeted interventions for this domain. |
This tool provides informational estimates and does not substitute professional advice. If anxiety interferes with safety, work, or relationships—or if panic features emerge—arrange assessment with a qualified clinician.
Parameter | Meaning | Unit | Typical range | Sensitivity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Items 1–21 | Symptom ratings (0–3) | integer | 0–3 | Primary input; no weighting |
Physical index | 14 bodily symptom items | sum | 0–42 | High when somatic cues dominate |
Cognitive index | 7 worry-oriented items | sum | 0–21 | High when thought patterns dominate |
Pattern label | Balanced vs physical/cognitive dominant | string | N/A | Guides tailored advice |
Panic flag | True when ≥ 2 severe panic markers | boolean | false/true | Highlights acute surge risk |
Response code | 21-character encoded answers | [0-3-]{21} | ---... | Supports URL sharing/restoration |
The response code updates only after you edit an answer, allowing you to share the resulting URL with a clinician if you choose.
All calculations use integers. Percent-based progress indicators are rounded to the nearest whole number, but totals, subscores, and thresholds use exact sums.
Field group | Accepted values | Notes | Placeholder |
---|---|---|---|
Items 1–21 | 0, 1, 2, 3 | Predefined options describe intensity wording. | None |
Query param r | [0-3-]{21} | Invalid codes are rejected and reset. | N/A |
The questionnaire prevents navigation past unanswered items; blanks are treated as zero only until you provide a rating.
Channel | Content | Encoding | Precision |
---|---|---|---|
User selections | Ordinal response 0–3 | Integer | Exact |
URL parameter r | 21-character response code | String | Exact |
Derived outputs | Total, subscores, band, panic flag | Number / boolean / string | Exact |
The encode/decode helpers ensure shared links reproduce the same scores without storing data on remote servers.
The tool runs entirely in the browser. All questions, scoring rules, and guidance are bundled locally; no external APIs or analytics endpoints are contacted.
Responses persist only in memory and optional query parameters. Reloading, closing the tab, or clearing the URL removes them instantly.
Computational complexity is O(21) for summing scores, and the gauge chart renders only after completion. Memory use stays constant because the app stores responses in a fixed-length array.
Given the same responses, the tool always produces identical totals, subscores, band labels, and panic flags. Drivers and strengths lists sort by score then item order, providing stable output for longitudinal tracking.
Inputs are restricted to enumerated options, no HTML is rendered from user data, and URL parameters are validated strictly. The tool never requests personal identifiers or credentials.
Scoring and interpretation mirror the original Beck and Steer (1987, 1990) validation studies, which set the four severity bands still used in clinical practice.
Physical and cognitive factor groupings follow the two-factor structure documented in clinical samples and adopted in contemporary anxiety assessment protocols.
All responses stay within the browser unless you share the encoded URL. Organisations deploying the tool should pair it with informed consent, confidentiality policies, and escalation paths consistent with mental-health regulations.