GDS-15 Threshold Snapshot
{{ totalScore }}/15
{{ summarySubline }}
{{ badge.text }}
{{ card.label }}
{{ card.value }}
{{ card.note }}

Quick 15-item check-in for mood and outlook over the past week.

  • Answer each yes-or-no item for the same recent week.
  • The original Stanford note says scores above 5 suggest follow-up and scores above 10 are almost always depression.
  • Your responses stay in this browser unless you choose to export them.
{{ progressPercent }}%
{{ answeredCount }}/{{ questionCount }} answered
  • {{ question.id }}. {{ question.text }}
/15
GDS-15 threshold lane

{{ chartIntro }}

What this result suggests

{{ interpretationLead }}

{{ overallLane.noteTitle }} {{ overallLane.noteText }}
Do now
  1. {{ step }}
Monitor
  • {{ step }}
Bring into follow-up
  • {{ step }}
When to seek support

{{ supportNote }}

Cutoff and boundary context

The original Stanford scoring note uses >5 and >10 wording. These rows keep scores of 5 and 10 explicit so the summary does not overstate what the rubric says.

Score Read it as Meaning
{{ row.rangeLabel }} {{ row.reading }} {{ row.why }}
Higher-scored items and retained anchors

The “Top area” card uses local follow-up clusters to organize the 15 items into readable themes. Those clusters are app-specific reading aids, not official GDS-15 subscales.

Higher-scored items
  • No items were scored in the depressive direction on this run.
  • {{ row.id }}. {{ row.text }}
Retained anchors
  • Every item was scored in the depressive direction on this run.
  • {{ row.id }}. {{ row.text }}
# Higher-scored item Retained anchor
{{ row.id }} {{ row.flaggedLabel }} {{ row.anchorLabel }}
Answered-question table

Every item remains aligned with the original yes/no response and its scored point.

# Item Response Point Follow-up cluster
{{ row.id }} {{ row.text }} {{ row.answer }} {{ row.scoredPoint }} {{ row.clusterLabel }}
Shareable JSON

This JSON keeps the threshold interpretation, follow-up context, and item-level answers together.


            
:

Introduction:

Depression in later life does not always arrive as obvious sadness. It can look like dropped interests, more time spent at home, lower energy, hopelessness, boredom, or a feeling that life has narrowed. The 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, usually shortened to GDS-15, turns those patterns into a brief past-week screen when the practical question is whether concern should move into a fuller mood review.

The short form was built for older adults and keeps the response format simple: yes or no for each statement. That matters when illness, fatigue, grief, pain, hearing problems, or mild cognitive change make longer questionnaires harder to finish. A quick screen does not solve the whole clinical picture, but it can make vague concern easier to name and easier to discuss.

Simple flow diagram showing 15 past-week yes-or-no items, keyed answers, a total score from 0 to 15, and follow-up rather than diagnosis.
The short form keeps the scoring simple, but the follow-up decision still depends on context, function, and specific answers.

The total score is only one part of the picture. A lower total does not prove that everything is fine, and a higher total does not explain why the pattern is happening. Sleep loss, pain, bereavement, medication effects, dementia, and other medical problems can overlap with mood change in older adults, which is why screening has to be followed by actual clinical judgment.

After a GDS-15 result, the next job is to ask what changed, how long it has lasted, and what kind of follow-up is needed now. That matters even more when hopelessness, worthlessness, withdrawal, or clear functional decline are already present.

The GDS-15 is a screening instrument, not a diagnosis and not a suicide-risk assessment. If answers point to immediate safety concerns or a sudden serious decline, urgent clinical or emergency help matters more than repeating the questionnaire.

Technical Details:

The GDS began as a 30-item screen, and the 15-item short form was later created by selecting questions that kept the strongest relationship with depressive symptoms. The response window stays narrow: how the person felt over the past week. That short window makes repeat screening easier to compare and keeps the questions anchored to a recent pattern instead of a vague lifetime impression.

Scoring is binary. Each item contributes either 0 or 1 point, so the total runs from 0 to 15. Most items move in the depressive direction when the answer is yes. Five well-being items work in reverse, so a no answer adds the point instead. That reverse keying is why the total can change even when two people mark the same number of yes answers.

The total score is the sum of 15 keyed item scores.

T = i = 1 15 s i
Which GDS-15 answers add one point
Answer that scores 1 point Question numbers What the pattern means
Yes 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15 The answer lines up with loss of interest, emptiness, boredom, fear, helplessness, withdrawal, memory worry, low self-worth, hopelessness, or discouraging comparison.
No 1, 5, 7, 11, 13 The answer signals reduced satisfaction, poorer spirits, less happiness, less sense that life is worthwhile, or lower energy.

Published shorthand around the short form is not identical across sources. The Stanford scoring page emphasizes two simple rules: scores above 5 suggest depression and warrant follow-up, while scores above 10 are almost always depression. Nursing summaries often compress the same total into broader bands such as 0 to 4, 5 to 8, 9 to 11, and 12 to 15. The score itself stays the same either way; the difference is how much caution a reader keeps around the boundary values.

That difference is why this assessment keeps 5 and 10 visible instead of burying them inside wider labels. The Hartford Institute summary also notes that the GDS is useful for repeated monitoring, is commonly used with healthy, medically ill, and mildly to moderately cognitively impaired older adults, and does not replace a diagnostic interview or suicidality assessment.

How boundary scores are read in this assessment
Score range Reading used here Why the boundary matters
0-4 Below follow-up line Below the Stanford >5 follow-up rule. This is reassuring only when the rest of the clinical picture is quiet too.
5 At follow-up edge A true boundary score. Many secondary summaries start a mild band here, while the Stanford page starts follow-up above 5.
6-9 Above follow-up line Clearly above the main follow-up rule, but still below the built-in >10 strong-positive wording.
10 Upper boundary score High enough to draw attention, yet still a boundary because the assessment keeps the >10 line explicit.
11-15 Above strong-positive line Above the Stanford >10 rule. At this point a fuller clinical review should not be delayed or reduced to casual repeat checking.

Early validation work summarized by the Hartford Institute reported high sensitivity and specificity, which explains why the screen is still widely used. Even so, screening accuracy changes across settings and populations. The safest way to read the GDS-15 is as a structured prompt for follow-up, not a stand-alone verdict.

Everyday Use & Decision Guide:

This assessment is most useful when an older adult, family member, or clinician needs a clearer read on recent withdrawal, low mood, fearfulness, emptiness, or loss of interest. It works well after a change in health, a move in living situation, repeated caregiver concern, or a stretch where day-to-day engagement has obviously slipped.

After all 15 answers are complete, the result panel keeps the total tied to several practical views at once. The threshold snapshot and gauge show where the score lands against the built-in follow-up lines. The overview cards show the overall lane, cutoff context, top local area, number of higher-scored items, change versus a prior score, and a retained anchor area. Side-by-side lists then show which items were scored in the depressive direction and which were not.

The optional assessment lens, previous score, and follow-up context all change the wording around the result without changing the score itself. That is useful because screening, monitoring, and care discussion are not the same conversation. A monitoring visit may care most about change from the last full run. A caregiver visit may care most about concrete examples of reduced activity or rising hopelessness.

The local follow-up themes used in the overview are reading aids created for this assessment. They help organize the 15 items into practical topics such as mood and outlook, activity and engagement, self-worth, or worry and helplessness. They are not official GDS-15 subscales, so the validated core result remains the total score.

  • Read the total score together with the overall lane and cutoff context before jumping to a label.
  • Use the higher-scored item list and top local area to start the follow-up conversation with specific changes, not only a number.
  • Use the previous-score field only for another complete GDS-15 that covered a comparable recent week.
  • Use the chart downloads, answered-question exports, or JSON export only when it is genuinely helpful to carry the result into a clinical or caregiver discussion.

Step-by-Step Guide:

  1. Select Begin Assessment and answer each yes-or-no item for the same past-week window.
  2. If you pause midway, use the question navigator to jump back to any open item. The result view does not appear until all 15 answers are complete.
  3. Read the GDS-15 Threshold Snapshot, Overall lane, and Cutoff context first so you know whether the score is below, at, or above the key follow-up edges.
  4. Open the Advanced panel only if you need more framing. Assessment lens, Previous GDS-15 score, and Follow-up context adjust the interpretation text, not the new total.
  5. Review Higher-scored items, Retained anchors, and the Answered-question table to see what actually drove the result.
  6. Use Download PNG, Download CSV, Export DOCX, Copy JSON, or Download JSON only when you are comfortable storing or sharing sensitive mood information.

Interpreting Results:

A total of 0 to 4 sits below the main built-in follow-up line, but it should not be read as an automatic all-clear. If appetite, sleep, motivation, mobility, social contact, or daily function have clearly worsened, those changes still matter. A low score can miss problems when the person minimizes symptoms or when the main issue is not captured well by the 15 items.

A score of 5 is a true boundary result. That is why the assessment does not rush to a broad label at that point. It is usually better to read the higher-scored items, ask what changed over the same week, and decide whether the concerns are persistent and functionally important. Scores from 6 to 9 move above the main follow-up line. A score of 10 is still kept separate because the built-in strong-positive wording starts only above 10.

Scores from 11 to 15 deserve faster, fuller follow-up. The result still does not diagnose the cause, but the chance of clinically important depression is high enough that waiting for another informal recheck is hard to justify. If the person also reports sharp hopelessness, worthlessness, or a clear drop in functioning, the number should support quicker action rather than replace it.

The extra result fields help keep interpretation specific. Top area points to the strongest local theme in this assessment. Higher-scored items show which statements contributed points. Retained anchors show where positive footing remains. Change vs prior is helpful only when the earlier score came from a full GDS-15 completed against a comparable recent week.

One practical rule helps avoid overreading: trust the total score for overall screening direction, then trust the item pattern for the actual follow-up conversation. The number tells you how much concern is present. The answers tell you what that concern sounds like in daily life.

Worked Examples:

Low total with one high-concern answer

A person scores 4 out of 15, which keeps the result below the main follow-up line. One higher-scored item is "Do you feel pretty worthless the way you are now?" Even with a low total, that answer deserves direct follow-up because the item itself carries more concern than the total alone might suggest.

Boundary score with social withdrawal

Another person scores 5 out of 15. The higher-scored items are dropped activities, boredom, and preferring to stay home. The safest reading is not "mild depression confirmed." It is "boundary score plus a clear withdrawal pattern," which is exactly the kind of result that should slow the reader down and prompt a better conversation about persistence and function.

Higher score with worsening trend

A follow-up visit enters a previous score of 7 and a current total of 11. The result now sits above the strong-positive line, and the change versus prior shows an increase of 4 points. That combination makes the prior comparison meaningful: the mood picture is worse, not merely still present. Bringing the higher-scored items and concrete examples of changed routine into follow-up becomes more important than the exact label.

Troubleshooting: no result appears

If the threshold snapshot and summary cards never show up, the most likely reason is that one or more questions are still unanswered. The navigator highlights where you are, and the score only renders after all 15 items have a yes or no response. Finish the open items first, then re-read the total in context.

FAQ:

Is a high GDS-15 score a diagnosis of depression?

No. The GDS-15 is a screening measure. A high score should lead to a fuller clinical review, not a self-contained diagnosis. Medical illness, grief, medication effects, and cognitive change can all affect how the answers look.

Why does this assessment separate 5 and 10 from the surrounding ranges?

Because the built-in scoring language keeps those edges explicit. The Stanford scoring page uses >5 for follow-up and >10 for the strongest warning. Many summaries compress the short form into wider severity bands, but this assessment keeps the boundary scores visible so they are not overstated.

Can I compare this score with an earlier one?

Yes, but only when the earlier result was another complete GDS-15 scored on the same 0 to 15 basis and answered for a comparable recent week. The previous-score field changes the follow-up wording and the change cue, not the current score.

Do my answers stay on the device?

Scoring happens in the browser and there is no server-side scoring step in this assessment. Even so, the current answer pattern, lens, baseline, and context can appear in the page URL, and exported files can store the result. Browser history, copied links, screenshots, and downloads can still expose private information.

What if hopelessness or worthlessness feels urgent?

Do not wait for the total score to settle the question. If there is immediate safety concern, thoughts of self-harm, or a sudden severe decline, seek urgent professional or emergency help. The GDS-15 does not assess suicidality on its own.

Are the local follow-up themes official GDS-15 subscales?

No. They are practical reading aids created for this assessment so the item pattern is easier to discuss. The validated GDS-15 result remains the total score, not the local theme labels.

Glossary:

GDS-15
The 15-item short form of the Geriatric Depression Scale, designed as a brief older-adult depression screen.
Reverse-keyed item
An item where a No answer scores the depressive point. In the GDS-15 these are items 1, 5, 7, 11, and 13.
Total score
The sum of all 15 keyed item scores, ranging from 0 to 15.
Cutoff context
The boundary label used in this assessment so values such as 5 and 10 stay visible instead of being hidden inside a wider band.
Higher-scored item
An item answered in the depressive direction on the current run, so it adds 1 point to the total.
Retained anchor
An item that did not score in the depressive direction on the current run, showing where more positive footing remains.