{{ row.hint }}
{{ chartLead }}
{{ chartNote }}
{{ interpretationLead }}
| Cut-point | Current result | Distance | Meaning here |
|---|---|---|---|
| {{ row.cutoff }}+ | {{ row.result }} | {{ row.distance }} | {{ row.note }} |
{{ disclaimerText }}
These are the symptom items currently carrying the screen signal.
{{ row.hint }}
No symptom items were endorsed on this run.
These items were not endorsed and help show what is quieter right now.
{{ row.hint }}
The screen completed at the trauma gate, so the five symptom items were not asked.
{{ supportNote }}
Export the trauma gate and item-level responses as a simple follow-up record.
| # | Prompt | Domain | Response | Score | Review note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ row.id }} | {{ row.prompt }} | {{ row.domain }} | {{ row.response }} | {{ row.scoreText }} | {{ row.note }} |
Use this if you want the same completed result in a machine-readable format.
Posttraumatic stress disorder screening in primary care has to be brief enough for routine visits while still separating likely trauma-related symptoms from general stress, grief, or burnout. The Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5, usually shortened to PC-PTSD-5, was built for that first pass. It is a short screen for probable PTSD after a frightening, horrible, or traumatic event.
The instrument starts with a trauma exposure question before it counts any symptoms. That first branch matters. If the answer is No, the official screen ends there. If the answer is Yes, five yes-or-no questions ask about symptoms during the past month, including unwanted memories, avoidance, hypervigilance or startle, numbness or detachment, and guilt or blame linked to the event.
That structure means a score of 0 can arise in two different ways: the official stop rule can apply after a No trauma gate, or all five symptom items can be asked after a Yes trauma gate and none are endorsed. PC-PTSD-5 is therefore most useful when the score is read together with the branch that produced it.
The screen is informational and is not a clinical diagnosis. A positive result means probable PTSD should be assessed further, preferably with a structured interview or another validated measure. A lower score does not prove that trauma-related symptoms are absent if sleep, concentration, relationships, work, or safety are already being affected.
PC-PTSD-5 uses a simple count score, but the count sits inside a branching rule. The opening question asks about lifetime exposure to an event the respondent experienced as frightening, horrible, or traumatic. If that answer is No, the instrument records 0/5 and stops. If that answer is Yes, each of the five symptom questions contributes one point for Yes and zero points for No.
The fifth symptom item was added in the DSM-5 revision to capture guilt or blame related to the event. The rest of the screen covers intrusion, avoidance, hypervigilance or startle, and numbness or detachment. None of these items is weighted more heavily than the others, so the screen total is a straight count rather than a severity-weighted scale.
In compact form, the score works like this:
The symbol S is the screen total. Each x term is one symptom item scored as 1 for Yes and 0 for No. The resulting total can only range from 0 to 5.
| Component | What it asks | Score contribution | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trauma gate | Whether a frightening, horrible, or traumatic event occurred | No ends the screen at 0/5; Yes opens the five symptom items | Distinguishes a formal stop rule from a fully scored low-symptom result |
| Nightmares or unwanted memories | Intrusion symptoms during the past month | Yes = 1, No = 0 | Flags uninvited memories or trauma-related dreams |
| Avoidance of reminders | Efforts to avoid thoughts, places, or situations tied to the event | Yes = 1, No = 0 | Shows whether daily routines are shrinking around trauma reminders |
| Hypervigilance or startle | Being constantly on guard, watchful, or easily startled | Yes = 1, No = 0 | Captures persistent threat-alert behavior |
| Numbness or detachment | Feeling cut off from people, activities, or surroundings | Yes = 1, No = 0 | Signals emotional disconnection rather than only fear |
| Guilt or blame loop | Guilt or blame linked to the event or its consequences | Yes = 1, No = 0 | Reflects the DSM-5 addition that broadened the older four-item version |
Cut-point choice changes how the same total is read. National Center for PTSD guidance notes that a cut-point of 4 best balanced false negatives and false positives in a large VA primary care sample. The same research still supports 3 as the more sensitive threshold, and it notes that some groups, including women in that validation study, may require a lower cut-point. That is why scores of 3 and 4 should not be treated as interchangeable.
| State | Boundary | Interpretation | Usual follow-up meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gate-stop result | Trauma gate = No | The official instrument ends before the five symptom items are scored | A 0/5 here means the stop rule applied, not that the full symptom set was negative |
| Below both common cut-points | 0 to 2/5 after a Yes trauma gate | Negative screen on both 3+ and 4+ interpretations | Trauma-related distress can still need follow-up if symptoms are persistent or disruptive |
| Threshold-split case | 3/5 after a Yes trauma gate | Positive at 3+, below 4+ | The screening goal and clinic policy determine whether this is treated as a positive screen |
| Positive at both common cut-points | 4 to 5/5 after a Yes trauma gate | Positive under both threshold views | Supports moving to fuller PTSD assessment rather than repeating the brief screener alone |
The result labels stay faithful to that logic. The total is still just a count, but the report keeps the trauma gate, both cut-points, and the endorsed symptom areas visible together so the screen is harder to overread.
Start with the trauma gate and answer it literally. If the event exposure answer is No, do not reinterpret the 0/5 result as a low symptom score. In the finished report, that branch is shown clearly as a gate-stop completion because the official instrument never moved into the five symptom items.
PC-PTSD-5 Trauma Screen Snapshot, Overall lane, and Cutoff context together before deciding what the total means.3+: Positive and 4+: Below, slow down. That exact 3/5 pattern is the main threshold-split case.Higher-scored focus to see which symptom areas are carrying the signal instead of talking only about the total.Response ledger so the trauma gate and item-level answers match what you intended to record.For a first pass, leave Follow-up lens on Screening snapshot. Switch it to Primary care handoff when you want the guidance written for a referral or clinic conversation, or to Repeat follow-up when you are comparing repeated runs over time. That setting only changes the wording of the next-step guidance. It does not change the trauma gate, the 0 to 5 total, or the 3+ and 4+ comparisons.
If the score looks milder than the person's lived experience, check the branch first and the endorsed items second. A 1/5 or 2/5 result after a Yes trauma gate can still matter when the same endorsed items keep returning or daily functioning is slipping. The report helps with that by keeping Higher-scored focus, Lower-scored anchors, and Recommended next actions on the same report.
If someone is unsure about one symptom item, it is better to pause than guess. The progress bar and question navigator make incomplete runs obvious, and the main result panel does not fully appear until the required prompts are finished. Once the answers are stable, the chart, response ledger, and JSON record can all travel with the same final run.
The most useful next step usually comes from one concrete output, not from the headline number alone. If Recommended next actions still feels too broad, go back to Higher-scored focus and name the endorsed symptom areas in the follow-up conversation.
This assessment flow follows the official PC-PTSD-5 sequence, then adds a review surface around the finished score.
Begin Assessment and answer the trauma gate first. If you choose No, expect the run to finish as a gate-stop result with an official total of 0/5.PC-PTSD-5 Trauma Screen Snapshot is not visible yet, the run is still incomplete. Use the question navigator to return to the unchecked item rather than reading a partial result.Advanced only if you want a different Follow-up lens. Screening snapshot, Primary care handoff, and Repeat follow-up change the guidance language but not the score.PC-PTSD-5 screen total, What this result suggests, and the Cut-point context table together. That combination shows whether the run stopped at the gate, fell below both thresholds, landed at the 3/5 split case, or screened positive at both 3+ and 4+.Higher-scored focus, Lower-scored anchors, and Recommended next actions to turn the score into a more specific follow-up discussion.Response ledger, chart exports, or JSON record only after the trauma gate, item responses, and threshold labels all look correct. That keeps every saved artifact tied to the same finished run.The first question is not "What is the number?" but "Which branch produced the number?" A gate-stop 0/5 and a fully scored 0/5 do not mean the same thing. Once the branch is clear, the common interpretation patterns are straightforward.
The main false-confidence trap is reading the total without the trauma gate, the cut-point labels, and the endorsed items. A positive screen does not diagnose PTSD, and a lower screen total does not cancel out distress that is persistent, disruptive, or safety-related. Before trusting the follow-up wording, verify that Trauma gate, Endorsed items, and Higher-scored focus match what you meant to answer.
If you need one quick verification cue, use the cutoff rows rather than the chart alone. The table spells out whether the total is above, at, or below 3+ and 4+, which is usually the most important interpretation check in this instrument.
A respondent answers the trauma gate No because their current distress is serious but not tied to an event they recognize as frightening, horrible, or traumatic. The summary immediately shows PC-PTSD-5 Trauma Screen Snapshot as 0/5, Overall lane as a gate-stop completion, and the review facts note that the symptom items asked were 0 of 5. The correct interpretation is not "all five PTSD items were negative." It is "the official PC-PTSD-5 stopped at the gate, so another kind of follow-up may be more appropriate."
Another respondent answers the trauma gate Yes, then endorses Nightmares or unwanted memories, Avoidance of reminders, and Hypervigilance or startle, while answering No to Numbness or detachment and Guilt or blame loop. The report shows 3/5, labels 3+: Positive and 4+: Below, and lists those three areas in Higher-scored focus. This is the classic split case: the run is positive under the more sensitive cut-point, but the setting still needs to decide whether 3/5 is enough to trigger the next assessment step.
A third respondent answers the trauma gate Yes and endorses nightmares, avoidance, hypervigilance, and guilt or blame, with numbness answered No. With Follow-up lens set to Primary care handoff, the report shows 4/5, Overall lane as positive at 3+ and 4+, and Recommended next actions shifts toward clinician follow-up wording. Here the number and the endorsed-item pattern both point in the same direction: the result is serving as a handoff aid into fuller PTSD evaluation, not as a stand-alone diagnosis.
Someone answers the trauma gate Yes, then marks Nightmares or unwanted memories as Yes, Avoidance of reminders as No, and Hypervigilance or startle as Yes, but leaves the last two items unanswered. The progress line shows 4/6 answered and the main summary has not appeared yet. After using the navigator to finish Numbness or detachment = No and Guilt or blame loop = No, the run completes as 2/5 with both cut-points below threshold. That is the correct fix for an incomplete run: finish the missing prompts rather than treating the missing chart as a blank or broken result.
This screen is informational and should support, not replace, professional diagnosis or treatment. If the result fits severe distress, ongoing violence, thoughts of self-harm, or any other immediate safety concern, move to urgent human help rather than waiting for another screening step.
It is positive at the more sensitive 3+ threshold and below the more balanced 4+ threshold. The report keeps both labels visible because the correct interpretation depends on the screening goal and the setting using the result.
That happens when the trauma gate is answered No. In PC-PTSD-5, that answer ends the official screen immediately, so the total becomes 0/5 by stop rule rather than by scoring five symptom answers.
No. It means the run fell below the common 3+ and 4+ cut-points, but it does not erase trauma-related distress. If the same endorsed items keep returning, or if sleep, concentration, relationships, work, or safety are being affected, a lower screen can still justify further assessment.
Only the wording of the guidance. Screening snapshot, Primary care handoff, and Repeat follow-up do not change the trauma gate, the 0 to 5 score, the endorsed items, or the 3+ and 4+ comparisons.
The main result surfaces appear only after the required prompts are complete. If the trauma gate is unanswered, or if one of the five symptom items is still pending after a Yes trauma gate, the progress bar and question navigator will show that the run is incomplete.
The scoring and report logic run in the browser, and there is no dedicated server-side scoring step for this assessment. However, the state is mirrored into URL query parameters and any CSV, DOCX, image, or JSON export will carry the same trauma-related answers shown on screen, so shared links and saved files should be treated as sensitive.