{{ item.short }}
{{ item.keepText }}
{{ gaugeNote }}
{{ interpretationLead }}
RSES is most defensible as a single total-score reflection. The common guide below is useful shorthand, but it should not be treated as a diagnostic threshold set.
| Score range | Common reading | How to use it |
|---|---|---|
| {{ row.rangeLabel }} | {{ row.label }} | {{ row.note }} |
{{ item.keepText }}
{{ item.reinforceText }}
{{ recheckText }}
| {{ row.label }} | {{ row.value }} |
|---|
| # | Item focus | Statement | Direction | Response | Recoded | Copy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ row.id }} |
{{ row.short }}
{{ row.signalLabel }}
|
{{ row.text }} | {{ row.directionLabel }} | {{ row.scoreLabel }} |
Changing any response here updates the score, cards, and chart immediately.
Self-esteem is a broad sense of personal worth, not a verdict on whether someone is confident in every situation. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, usually shortened to RSES, turns that broad feeling into a short set of ten statements so people can check how positively or negatively they are viewing themselves right now.
This tool scores all ten items on a 0 to 30 scale and then adds a package-level explanation layer. The result includes a total score, a Low, Normal, or High band, a gauge, and a written summary that splits the answers into Affirmation and Self-acceptance so the profile is easier to discuss.
That is useful when someone wants a quick reflection prompt before journaling, counseling, coaching, or a personal reset. It is also useful for repeat check-ins when the main question is whether self-regard is becoming steadier over time rather than whether one answer on one day feels flattering.
A realistic example is someone reviewing the scale after a rough week at work or after several weeks of deliberate self-compassion practice. The number alone matters less than whether the same response frame is being used each time and whether the lower-scoring items keep pointing to the same pressure points.
This result is informational and not a psychiatric diagnosis or personality label. A low band does not explain why self-worth feels shaky, and a high band does not mean someone is immune to setbacks, insecurity, or overconfidence. It is a structured snapshot, not a complete account of a person.
Use the tool when you want a broad self-view check rather than a symptom screen for a specific disorder. The opening prompt asks for how you feel right now, so it works best when you answer in one sitting and avoid overediting each statement.
For a first pass, move quickly enough that the responses still feel spontaneous. The app is strongest at showing an overall pattern through Total, the band badge, and the split between Affirmation and Self-acceptance. It is weaker if you treat one statement as the whole story.
A Normal or High result is not permission to stop thinking critically about context. Someone can score well after a good day or while still struggling in one domain, and someone can score low after a specific setback without that number explaining their entire identity. Before you trust the result, check whether the lower-scoring items in the written summary match what actually feels difficult.
This is a good fit for reflection, coaching, and self-monitoring. It is not a replacement for fuller assessment when self-esteem problems are tied to depression, trauma, eating disorders, or active crisis. If you want to compare runs, keep the same mindset and timing each time so the change in Total means more than a change in circumstance.
As with the EPDS tool bundle, privacy depends partly on link handling. The package has no tool-specific backend, but it stores the response pattern in the URL parameter r, so a shared link can recreate the answers even though nothing is uploaded to a dedicated server for scoring.
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is a 10-item self-report measure of global self-esteem. Five items are positively worded and five are negatively worded, which is why the scoring engine has to reverse the negative statements before the answers can be summed into one overall total.
This package uses the common 0 to 3 coding pattern with four response options from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree. Items 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 are added directly. Items 3, 5, 8, 9, and 10 are transformed as 3 - response, so a more negative endorsement lowers the recoded contribution before the final score is calculated.
The app then adds two interpretation layers that are useful but not canonical to every RSES workflow. It groups the positive items into Affirmation and the reverse-scored negative items into Self-acceptance, and it labels each grouping as low, moderate, or high by splitting the 0 to 15 range into thirds. Those grouped labels are package-defined reading aids rather than official subscales required by the original instrument.
Band thresholds are also fixed in the package. Totals from 0 to 14 map to Low, totals from 15 to 25 map to Normal, and totals from 26 to 30 map to High. Because different summaries of the Rosenberg scale can use slightly different interpretation conventions, the cleanest comparisons come from repeating the same tool with the same coding and thresholds.
The package total is the sum of ten recoded item values:
Here si equals the stored response for positive items and 3 - response for the negative items 3, 5, 8, 9, and 10.
| Field or symbol | Meaning in this package | Range | Where it appears |
|---|---|---|---|
T |
Total recoded RSES score | 0-30 | Summary box, overview cards, gauge |
Affirmation |
Items 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 summed directly | 0-15 | Summary chips and subscore panel |
Self-acceptance |
Items 3, 5, 8, 9, and 10 after reverse scoring | 0-15 | Summary chips and subscore panel |
Drivers |
Highest recoded items, listed when score is 3 | 0-3 per item | Drivers & strengths panel |
Strengths |
Lowest recoded items, listed when score is 0 or 1 | 0-3 per item | Drivers & strengths panel |
| Band or label | Lower | Upper | Package meaning | Boundary rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Low |
0 | 14 | Lowest package band for total score | Total <= 14 |
Normal |
15 | 25 | Middle package band for total score | 15 <= total <= 25 |
High |
26 | 30 | Highest package band for total score | Total >= 26 |
| Grouped labels | n/a | n/a | low, moderate, high for each 15-point grouping |
Breaks occur at one-third and two-thirds of the 15-point maximum |
The package also keeps state in a compact ten-character r string made of digits 0 to 3 and - for unanswered items. That gives the tool bookmark-style persistence without adding a tool-specific server call, but it also means the URL itself can carry sensitive response data.
Use this flow when you want a complete snapshot rather than a half-finished impression.
Start Assessment after reading the opening note. The tool is meant to reflect how you feel right now, so it is best used in one sitting.Strongly agree to Strongly disagree. The progress bar and question list show which items are already complete.Low, Normal, or High band, plus completion and primary-score cards.Affirmation, Self-acceptance, Drivers & strengths, and the profile notes. This is where the app explains which statements pulled the result up or down.Copy CSV, Download CSV, or Export DOCX only if you are comfortable keeping that record. Avoid sharing a bookmark or copied link unless you are willing to share the encoded response state too.The total score is the anchor, but it is not the only useful output. The band badge tells you where the score lands, while Affirmation and Self-acceptance show whether the pattern is being driven more by weak positive self-regard, harsher self-judgment, or a fairly balanced mix.
Low band means the package total is 14 or below. It does not diagnose depression, anxiety, trauma, or any other condition, and it does not explain why self-esteem feels low.High band is not proof of perfect mental health. Verify the lower-scoring statements in the written summary before you assume there is nothing worth working on.A practical next step is to read the Focus item and the lower-scoring statements together. They often point to the most useful topic for journaling, coaching, or a professional conversation.
Suppose a user answers the positive items mostly with Agree and the negative items mostly with Disagree. One pattern of that kind produces Total 20, the Normal band, Affirmation 10/15, and Self-acceptance 10/15. The package reads that as a broadly balanced, middle-range self-view rather than a profile pulled sharply in one direction.
If someone answers most positive statements with Strongly agree and the negative statements with Disagree, the app can return Total 25. That still stays in the Normal band because the package's High category starts only at 26. This is a good reminder to check exact thresholds instead of assuming that any score in the twenties is automatically in the top band.
A user answers nine items and expects the gauge to render immediately. The summary does not show because the app waits for all ten statements before it calculates Total and the band badge. Once the last item is answered, the overview cards, the written analysis, and the answers table all appear together.
No. The package uses the Rosenberg items to summarize self-esteem, but the result is not a diagnosis. A Low band is better treated as a prompt for reflection or follow-up than as a label for what is wrong.
Because five statements are negatively worded. The app flips items 3, 5, 8, 9, and 10 as 3 - response so that higher recoded values consistently mean stronger self-esteem before the total is summed.
No. They are package-defined groupings that help explain which side of the item set is driving the current result. They are useful for this tool's interpretation layer, but the original scale is usually treated as a global self-esteem measure.
The bundle has no tool-specific backend for scoring, but the response pattern is written into the URL parameter r. That means browser state stays local unless you choose to copy or share the link.