{{ interpretationLead }}
All items landed at Disagree, so there are no endorsed statements to rank in this run.
With every style signal at zero, the lower-end items are all tied in this run.
{{ useNote }}
Consider extra support if: {{ supportNote }}
This table mirrors the scored inputs that produced the current proxy profile, so you can review or export the exact response ledger.
| # | Style signal | Prompt | Answer | Points | Copy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ row.id }} | {{ row.styleLabel }} | {{ row.text }} | {{ row.answerLabel }} | {{ row.scoreLabel }} |
Attachment style is less about having one permanent romantic type and more about how closeness, distance, reassurance, and conflict feel when a relationship becomes emotionally important. This proxy focuses on four familiar adult patterns: secure, avoidant, ambivalent, and disorganized. The goal is to make those pulls visible without pretending one short self-report can explain the whole relationship.
The assessment is an original 16-item proxy, not the copyrighted official ACS Mini questionnaire. You answer with one current close relationship, one recent relationship pattern, or one recurring pattern across close relationships in mind. The result then turns the answers into a four-style snapshot, a donut chart, ranked style cards, and a response ledger that stays local unless you deliberately export or share it.
That makes the tool useful for reflection, therapy preparation, or calmer relationship conversations. It is not a diagnosis, and it is not a verdict about the other person's motives. It is a way to name what tends to happen inside closeness and uncertainty.
Each of the four style groups has four items scored from 0 to 3, so every style can land anywhere from 0 to 12. The tool does not force the four styles to add up to a fixed personality type. Instead, it shows the raw style totals, the share of endorsed points each style carries, the gap between the top style and the runner-up, and the overall spread from highest to lowest style.
Two controls shape the interpretation without changing the scoring. The Lens setting changes whether the follow-up wording sounds more like self-reflection, a relationship conversation, or therapy preparation. The Focus setting changes whether the narrative is framed around one current bond, a recent pattern, or a recurring pattern across close relationships. The raw style scores stay the same.
| Style | What a stronger score usually points to | What a lighter score usually points to |
|---|---|---|
| Secure | Comfort with closeness, repair, direct support-seeking, and steadier trust during time apart. | Secure cues appear, but they are not carrying the profile strongly in this run. |
| Avoidant | Distance-protective habits, self-reliance, and pulling back when need or intimacy rises. | Less reflexive withdrawal and less discomfort with closeness or dependence. |
| Ambivalent | Reassurance-seeking, separation sensitivity, and chasing repair quickly when uncertainty appears. | Lower abandonment sensitivity and less pressure to secure contact immediately. |
| Disorganized | Push-pull conflict around closeness, fear-based alarm, or difficulty settling once intimacy and stress collide. | Less fear-driven confusion or approach-avoid conflict in the chosen relationship lens. |
Because the tool shows shares and gaps instead of forcing one label, mixed profiles stay visible. That matters because many people do not fit neatly into a single attachment pattern across every setting.
The most important choice happens before the first answer. Pick one emotionally meaningful relationship or one repeated pattern and keep that same target in mind all the way through. If you answer from a vague self-image, the result usually becomes flatter and less useful.
After scoring, read the top style together with the runner-up. A strong avoidant top style with secure as the runner-up tells a different story from avoidant with disorganized as the runner-up. A narrow gap between the top two styles is a sign to read the result as mixed rather than as a clean single-style label.
A dominant style means one pattern is currently carrying more of the answered relationship signal than the others. It does not mean the other styles are absent. A mixed top result usually means different attachment habits appear in different moments. A flat profile can happen when the chosen relationship does not feel very activating, or when the answers were not tied to one specific bond or repeated pattern.
Secure is not the same thing as perfect. Avoidant is not the same thing as not caring. Ambivalent is not the same thing as immaturity. Disorganized is not the same thing as a psychiatric diagnosis. The most useful reading is behavioral: when you feel uncertain, do you ask directly, chase reassurance, shut down, or swing between wanting closeness and fearing it?
A secure-leading profile with avoidant as the runner-up may describe someone who handles repair well but still pulls inward when dependence rises quickly.
An ambivalent and avoidant tie often reads like a pursue-and-pull-away cycle rather than one clean attachment label.
A disorganized-heavy result is most helpful when it leads to specific examples of alarm, flooding, or confusion around closeness instead of being treated as a fixed identity statement.
No. The focus and lens settings only change the interpretation wording. The raw style totals do not change.
Because people often use different attachment habits in different moments. A tie usually means the run is mixed rather than cleanly single-style.
No. A stronger secure score only means secure-style items carried more of the current response pattern than the other three groups.
No. This is a self-reflection proxy. It is most useful when you use it to describe your own responses inside closeness, conflict, and uncertainty.