Item {{ item.id }}. {{ item.text }}
{{ item.note }}
{{ chartLead }}
{{ interpretationLead }}
The highlighted row shows the active published BDI-II band. Borderline context here reflects score distance to the next threshold, not a diagnosis.
| Score | Band | Typical follow-up |
|---|---|---|
| {{ band.rangeLabel }} | {{ band.label }} | {{ band.shortAction }} |
These are the most endorsed items in this result, paired with the tool-specific review group used to organize follow-up.
{{ item.note }}
| # | Higher-scored focus | Lower-scored anchor |
|---|---|---|
| {{ row.id }} |
{{ row.highLabel }}
({{ row.highScore }})
{{ row.highGroup }}
|
{{ row.lowLabel }}
({{ row.lowScore }})
{{ row.lowGroup }}
|
{{ block.text }}
{{ supportNote }}
This table mirrors the scored inputs used for the total and the tool-specific review groups.
| # | Item | Response | Score | Review group | Copy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ row.id }} | {{ row.text }} | {{ row.answer }} | {{ row.score }} | {{ row.groupLabel }} |
Structured export of the summary, score-lane context, and answered items.
The Beck Depression Inventory-II, usually shortened to BDI-II, is a 21-item self-report measure for depressive symptoms over the last two weeks. Each answer is scored from 0 to 3, then added into a total from 0 to 63. That total is the formal result. This page places it into the published BDI-II severity bands so you can see where the score sits before reading any extra interpretation.
That structure helps when the past two weeks have felt heavier than usual but the pattern is hard to describe cleanly. Depression can show up through sadness, pessimism, guilt, slowed effort, sleep change, appetite change, or the sense that ordinary tasks now take more push than they should. A checklist does not explain the cause, but it can turn a vague impression into a usable summary.
This page adds several reading aids around the official score. It highlights the current band, shows how close the total is to the next cutoff, ranks the strongest item-level contributors, and groups items into three page-level review areas so the result is easier to discuss. You can also add an earlier BDI-II total, plus optional direction notes for the sleep and appetite items, without changing the score itself.
Item 9 receives separate attention for a reason. In the BDI-II, that item covers suicidal thoughts or wishes. The official Pearson sample report treats endorsement there as a danger signal that should prompt direct clinical follow-up, and this page follows the same practical logic by surfacing any non-zero response clearly instead of letting it disappear inside the total.
Use the result as a structured screening snapshot, a repeat check-in, or a clearer note for a visit. Do not use it as a diagnosis. Depression screening is most useful when it leads to assessment, support, and follow-up. If safety feels uncertain, or if thoughts of self-harm are active, seek direct human help now rather than waiting for another questionnaire.
The scoring rule is simple. Every one of the 21 items contributes 0, 1, 2, or 3 points. The page adds those values directly to get the total score. The published band comes from that total alone. The assessment lens, previous-score field, and the optional sleep or appetite direction notes only change the summary wording and follow-up context shown around the result.
| Score range | Band | How to read it here |
|---|---|---|
| 0 to 13 | Minimal | The questionnaire shows relatively light current depressive symptom burden. |
| 14 to 19 | Mild | Symptoms are present and worth watching, especially if they persist or daily function is slipping. |
| 20 to 28 | Moderate | The score has reached a range where direct follow-up usually matters more than passive waiting. |
| 29 to 63 | Severe | The heaviest published band, which usually warrants prompt clinical review. |
| Added layer | Rule used here | Why it helps |
|---|---|---|
| Cutoff context | The page states whether the score sits at the start of a band, deeper inside it, or a few points below the next threshold. | Keeps borderline scores from being read too casually. |
| Review groups | The answers are summarized into cognition and outlook, self-view and engagement, and energy and body rhythm. | Shows which broad symptom area is contributing most to the current total. |
| Highest-scored items | Items are ranked by score, with ties resolved by item order. | Makes the strongest current symptoms visible before you scan the full response table. |
| Previous-score comparison | If you enter an earlier BDI-II total, the page subtracts it from the current score. | Supports repeat check-ins, while still leaving the official score unchanged. |
| Sleep and appetite direction | When those items are active, you can note whether the change went lower, higher, or mixed. | Adds clinical context that the raw 0 to 3 item score does not show on its own. |
Those review groups are not official BDI-II subscales. Research often discusses cognitive and somatic symptom patterns in the BDI-II, but this page uses its own three organizing groups to keep the output readable. The official score stays the total and the published band, while the groups act as a discussion aid.
The previous-score field is a simple arithmetic comparison, not a formal reliable-change calculation. That distinction matters. A difference of a few points can be useful to notice, but the safer interpretation still comes from comparing the total, the band, and the highest-rated items together.
All scoring happens in the browser. The page can export the gauge as PNG or CSV, the full response table as CSV or DOCX, and a structured JSON record of the summary and item responses. Copied text, downloaded files, and shareable links can preserve sensitive answers, so privacy depends partly on what you keep or send after the page finishes scoring.
Keep the recall window tight. The BDI-II is about the last two weeks, not your whole life and not just today. If you answer with a broader memory, the score becomes harder to compare later. If you plan to repeat the assessment, use the same two-week frame each time so the trend stays readable.
Start with the total and the band. Then look at the cutoff note. A score of 19 and a score of 14 are both in the mild range, but they do not feel the same in practice because one is sitting just below the moderate threshold. This page makes that visible so you do not stop at the band label alone.
Next, look at what is driving the score. The top review group and the highest-scored items usually tell the story faster than the headline number. A result led by guilt, worthlessness, and pessimism suggests a different follow-up conversation than a result led by fatigue, sleep change, appetite change, and concentration difficulty, even when the totals are similar.
The optional previous-score field is best used only when the earlier number came from another complete BDI-II run. Entering a rough memory, a score from a different depression scale, or a result collected over a different time frame makes the comparison look more exact than it really is. The page can still subtract the numbers, but the meaning becomes shaky.
The sleep and appetite direction menus matter only when those items are actually elevated. They do not change the score. They simply help the written summary say whether the issue was eating less or more, sleeping less or more, or shifting in both directions. That can make a visit note or repeat check-in more useful.
Treat Item 9 as a separate decision point. Even if the overall total is low or mid-range, a non-zero response there should move the result out of routine self-tracking and into direct human follow-up. The page is built to keep that signal visible because total scores can otherwise hide the most urgent answer.
The BDI-II total is a measure of current depressive symptom burden on this questionnaire. It is not a diagnosis, and it does not tell you why symptoms are present. A similar total can reflect depression, grief, burnout, chronic stress, illness burden, medication effects, or overlap between several of these. That is why the safest reading starts with the score, then checks the item pattern, then asks what else was happening during the same two weeks.
The band names are useful, but they should not flatten the detail. Minimal or mild scores can still matter when symptoms have lasted, when functioning is dropping, or when one or two answers are especially concerning. Moderate or severe scores raise the urgency, but the next step is still better when it is tied to the strongest items rather than to the band name alone.
Item 9 changes the interpretation path. The official Pearson sample report advises clinicians to probe suicidal thinking and assess whether immediate intervention is needed when that item is endorsed. This page mirrors that practical caution. A non-zero Item 9 response is a follow-up issue in its own right, even if the total score is not in the highest band.
The previous-score comparison is best treated as context, not proof. If the current score is higher than a prior score, the question is not only how many points changed, but also which items rose and whether the result crossed into a new band. If the score is lower, that is useful too, but improvement is easier to trust when the highest-rated items have softened instead of merely swapping places.
Screening works best when it leads somewhere concrete. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends depression screening in care settings that can support diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Read this result in that spirit: as structured evidence for what to bring into a clinician visit, therapy session, or urgent support conversation, not as a final answer on your own.
A person scores 12. The page places the result in the minimal band, but the highest items are loss of pleasure, fatigue, and concentration difficulty. That result is lighter than a moderate or severe score, yet it can still be useful to document if the pattern is new, persistent, or beginning to interfere with school, work, or daily routine.
Another person scores 23 and enters a previous BDI-II total of 17. The page shows a 6-point increase, places the current score in the moderate band, and may highlight energy and body rhythm if fatigue, sleep change, and concentration difficulty are carrying much of the total. That combination argues for direct follow-up rather than simple watchful waiting.
A person scores 16 overall, which falls in the mild range, but Item 9 is scored at 1. The total still matters, yet the decision path changes. The page flags direct human follow-up because the safety issue should not be absorbed into routine trend tracking.
The progress bar is still below 100% and the summary cards are missing. In that situation, at least one of the 21 items is still unanswered. The next step is to return to the unchecked item, complete it, and then read the total and band once the page finishes the full assessment.
No. The lens only changes how the summary is framed for screening, monitoring, or visit preparation. The total score and published band stay the same.
No. They are page-level organizing aids. The formal BDI-II result remains the total score and severity band.
Because suicidal thoughts or wishes need their own follow-up decision. A low total does not cancel a non-zero Item 9 response.
Yes, but only when the earlier number came from another complete BDI-II result using a similar two-week window. The page shows a simple score difference, not a formal change-significance test.
The scoring runs in the browser, and this tool does not rely on a tool-specific server calculation. The main privacy risk comes from copied text, downloaded files, and URLs that preserve your response state.
You can download the score gauge as PNG or CSV, export the full response table as CSV or DOCX, and copy or download a JSON record that includes the summary and item-level answers.