# | {{ resultText.questionCol }} | {{ resultText.answerCol }} |
---|---|---|
{{ a.id }} | {{ a.text }} | {{ a.answer }} |
Depressive symptoms influence mood, thinking, energy, and motivation, making it easy to miss how much impact they have day to day. The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) brings those signals together through twenty-one statements scored on a four-point scale, creating a clear picture of how the past two weeks—including today—have felt.
Each item captures a facet of depression—sadness, pessimism, guilt, sleep changes, fatigue, loss of interest. As you pick the statement that best matches your experience, the inventory tallies a total score (0 to 63), cognitive and somatic subscores, and snapshot trackers for sleep, appetite, energy, and concentration. Together they reveal whether thoughts, physical changes, or specific symptom clusters are driving difficulty.
Imagine someone who feels persistently sad and self-critical (score 3 on items 1–3), struggles to concentrate and make decisions (score 2 on items 13 and 19), yet maintains appetite and sleep (score 0). Their total may fall in the Moderate band with a cognitive-dominant profile, showing that therapy targeting thought patterns and self-talk may move the needle faster than focusing on physical routines alone.
Answer honestly without minimising or amplifying how you feel, revisit the tool at consistent intervals using the same two-week window, and note contextual factors such as recent grief, medication changes, or acute illness that may shift scores temporarily. Elevated totals—especially any endorsement of suicidal thoughts—are signals to contact a qualified professional immediately. Use the shorter PHQ-9 if you need a quick consultation screener; rely on the full BDI-II when you want richer detail on symptom clusters and change over time.
The BDI-II measures the severity of depressive symptomatology experienced during the previous two weeks. Each of the 21 items presents four ordered statements scored 0–3, covering emotional tone, self-evaluation, cognitive slowing, and somatic changes. Respondents choose the statement that best describes their experience.
The total score T is the sum of all item scores, yielding a 0–63 range. Thirteen items (1–13) form a cognitive-affective subscore C, while eight items (14–21) comprise a somatic-performance subscore S. Subscores are graded none, mild, moderate, or severe based on quartile thresholds relative to their maximums (39 for cognitive, 24 for somatic). A profile label highlights whether cognitive symptoms exceed somatic ones by three points or more, whether somatic symptoms dominate, or whether the pattern is mixed.
Severity bands follow Beck’s guidelines: Minimal (0–13), Mild (14–19), Moderate (20–28), and Severe (29–63). Item-level trackers spotlight sleep changes (item 16), appetite shifts (item 18), fatigue (item 20), concentration (item 19), and suicidal thoughts (item 9), enabling quick review of high-risk themes.
Interpretation assumes adult respondents, literacy compatible with the inventory wording, and the ability to differentiate depression from overlapping medical conditions. The tool does not diagnose major depressive disorder on its own, nor does it assess bipolarity, psychosis, or substance-related mood changes; those require clinical assessment.
Symbol | Meaning | Unit / datatype | Source |
---|---|---|---|
Score for item i (0–3) | integer | Input | |
Total BDI-II score | 0–63 | Derived | |
Cognitive-affective subscore (items 1–13) | 0–39 | Derived | |
Somatic-performance subscore (items 14–21) | 0–24 | Derived |
A respondent reports sadness most of the day (item 1 score 3), pessimism (item 2 score 2), self-dislike (item 7 score 2), indecisiveness (item 13 score 2), concentration problems (item 19 score 2), sleep disruption (item 16 score 1), appetite loss (item 18 score 1), fatigue (item 20 score 2), and minimal suicidal thoughts (item 9 score 1). All other items stay at mild (score 1).
A total of 34 falls in the Severe band. Cognitive symptoms outpace somatic ones, signalling that therapy focused on thinking patterns and self-worth may be especially helpful, while the presence of suicidal ideation requires immediate professional follow-up.
Band | Score range | Interpretation |
---|---|---|
Minimal | 0 to 13 | Little to no depressive symptom burden; continue monitoring. |
Mild | 14 to 19 | Symptoms present but manageable; lifestyle adjustments or brief therapy may help. |
Moderate | 20 to 28 | Meaningful impairment likely; pursue structured treatment. |
Severe | 29 to 63 | High distress; seek comprehensive professional evaluation promptly. |
Label | Threshold | Meaning |
---|---|---|
None | ≤ 25% of max | Domain has minimal symptom weight. |
Mild | ≤ 50% of max | Domain contributes but remains manageable. |
Moderate | ≤ 75% of max | Domain significantly affects daily life. |
Severe | > 75% of max | Domain dominates; prioritise targeted intervention. |
This tool provides informational estimates and does not substitute professional advice. Treat any elevation in suicidal thoughts or rapid score increases as an emergency, contacting crisis services or trusted clinicians immediately.
Parameter | Meaning | Unit | Typical range | Sensitivity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Items 1–21 | Symptom ratings across cognitive and somatic domains | 0–3 integer | 0–3 | Primary inputs |
Cognitive index | Sum of items 1–13 | 0–39 | 0–39 | Highlights thought-related burden |
Somatic index | Sum of items 14–21 | 0–24 | 0–24 | Highlights physical changes |
Sleep tracker | Item 16 severity word | string | None–Severe | Guides sleep interventions |
Appetite tracker | Item 18 severity word | string | None–Severe | Flags nutritional changes |
Fatigue tracker | Item 20 severity word | string | None–Severe | Signals energy deficits |
Concentration tracker | Item 19 severity word | string | None–Severe | Identifies cognitive slowing |
Suicidal thought score | Item 9 value | 0–3 | 0–3 | Triggers urgent escalation |
Response code | 21-character encoded answers | [0-3-]{21} | ---... | Supports URL sharing/restoration |
The response code updates once you start answering, enabling secure sharing with clinicians while keeping data in the browser.
All calculations operate on integers. Progress percentages round to whole numbers; totals and subscores remain exact sums.
Field group | Accepted values | Notes | Placeholder |
---|---|---|---|
Items 1–21 | 0, 1, 2, 3 | Each option includes descriptive text. | None |
Query param r | [0-3-]{21} | Invalid encodings are ignored and reset. | N/A |
The app requires every item to be answered before presenting totals; unanswered questions remain highlighted until completed.
Channel | Content | Encoding | Precision |
---|---|---|---|
User selections | Ordinal 0–3 values with descriptive text | Integer | Exact |
URL parameter r | 21-character response code | String | Exact |
Derived outputs | Total, subscores, band, pattern, trackers | Numbers / strings | Exact |
State synchronisation delays URL updates until you interact, keeping the initial load clean while still allowing you to bookmark results.
The tool runs locally with no API calls. All question text, scoring tables, and next-step guidance are embedded constants, so results appear instantly and remain available offline.
Responses exist only in memory and optional query parameters. Reloading or clearing the URL removes them immediately.
Summations operate in O(21) time with minimal memory usage. Visualisations render once after completion and resize on demand, keeping the experience responsive even on low-powered devices.
Identical inputs always produce the same totals, subscores, pattern labels, and suggested steps. Drivers and strengths lists order by score then item number, ensuring consistent comparisons over time.
All selections are limited to predefined options. Response codes are validated against strict regular expressions, and the app never stores or transmits personal identifiers.
Scoring and severity bands follow Beck, Steer, and Brown’s 1996 revision of the inventory, which aligned the BDI-II with DSM-IV criteria.
The cognitive versus somatic factor structure mirrors meta-analytic findings used in clinical and research settings to interpret change over time.
Responses live only in the browser and optional shareable URLs. Healthcare providers embedding the tool should pair it with informed consent, secure storage practices, and crisis protocols aligned with regional mental-health regulations.