This primary chart keeps the five resilience support domains on the same 0 to 4 average scale.
Read it first to see where support stays broad, where it thins out, and whether the current run is evenly supported or leaning on just one or two domains.
{{ interpretationLead }}
Use the left column to protect what is already working and the right column to choose the next reinforcement target.
| Keep stronger support | Current signal | Reinforce next | Current signal |
|---|---|---|---|
|
{{ row.keep.short }}
{{ row.keep.domainLabel }}
{{ row.keep.keepText }}
—
|
{{ row.keep.scoreLabel }} · {{ row.keep.strengthLabel }} — |
{{ row.reinforce.short }}
{{ row.reinforce.domainLabel }}
{{ row.reinforce.reinforceText }}
—
|
{{ row.reinforce.scoreLabel }} · {{ row.reinforce.strengthLabel }} — |
{{ supportNote }}
| Proxy total | Average/item | Level | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| {{ row.rangeLabel }} | {{ row.averageRangeLabel }} | {{ row.label }} | {{ row.tableGuide }} |
These interpretation bands are custom to this proxy and are not official CD-RISC-10 norms.
Use this keyed response ledger to review the exact prompts and support notes feeding the current proxy result before exporting it.
| # | Support item | Domain | Prompt | Response | Support note | Copy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ row.id }} |
{{ row.short }}
{{ row.scoreLabel }} · {{ row.strengthLabel }}
|
{{ row.domainLabel }} | {{ row.text }} | {{ row.supportNote }} |
Changing any response here updates the proxy score, support map, and guidance immediately.
This structured export keeps the current proxy total, support map, advanced context, and answer ledger together.
Resilience is not the absence of stress. It is the ability to keep functioning, adapt after disruption, reconnect with support, and regain steadier footing after conflict, bad news, illness, or uncertainty. That distinction matters because many people can endure a hard week yet still feel as if they never quite get their balance back.
The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, often shortened to CD-RISC, was created as a brief way to summarize perceived resilience. This page does not reproduce the licensed CD-RISC-10 item text. Instead, it uses an original 10-item proxy with the same 0 to 4 response rhythm and the same broad focus on flexibility, persistence, support, recovery, and self-trust.
That makes the result useful for reflection after a pressure period, for comparing two similar stress windows, or for checking whether a new routine, therapy plan, sleep change, or support structure is helping you recover more consistently. The score is most informative when you keep the reflection window stable enough that you are not comparing a calm month with a crisis week.
The output is a resilience reflection snapshot, not an official CD-RISC-10 score and not a diagnosis. A higher result does not mean you are immune to overload, and a lower result does not explain why resilience feels strained. It only describes how strongly these ten proxy statements fit right now.
The proxy uses ten items scored from 0 to 4, where higher values mean the resilience statement feels more true in the chosen reflection window. The total score is the direct sum of all ten answers, so the possible range is 0 to 40. There are no reverse-keyed items in this build.
The page also groups the items into five local explanation lanes with two items each. Those lanes are Adaptability, Steady effort, Support and orientation, Recovery rhythm, and Self-trust. They are not official CD-RISC subscales. They are added here to make it easier to see whether the total is being pulled down by flexibility, social steadiness, emotional reset, or confidence under pressure.
| Lane | What it is trying to capture | Items | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptability | Finding another workable route and adjusting to change without losing all momentum | 2 | 0 to 8 |
| Steady effort | Keeping the next step visible and staying with a long problem under pressure | 2 | 0 to 8 |
| Support and orientation | Reaching for support, meaning, or a controllable next move during strain | 2 | 0 to 8 |
| Recovery rhythm | Rebuilding routine and regaining emotional balance after setbacks | 2 | 0 to 8 |
| Self-trust | Believing you can stay useful and handle more than the moment first suggests | 2 | 0 to 8 |
| Band | Lower | Upper | How the page reads it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thin resilience reserve | 0 | 14 | Supports are hard to access consistently under current pressure. |
| Rebuilding resilience reserve | 15 | 24 | Some resilience habits are present, but they still loosen under strain. |
| Working resilience reserve | 25 | 33 | Several supports are working, with a few stretch points still visible. |
| Strong resilience reserve | 34 | 40 | Resilience supports look broadly available and repeatable in the chosen window. |
Two settings change interpretation wording without changing the math: Reflection frame and Challenge context. The optional prior total is also comparison only. It is valid only when it comes from the same ten-item proxy on the same 0 to 40 scale. The finished result can also be exported as chart images, CSV, and JSON, and the response state can be restored from the compact answer code in the URL.
The best first pass is to choose one stress frame and stay with it. The page lets you view the result as a current pressure window, the last 30 days, or your usual pattern, but those labels only help if the answers all refer to the same real period. Mixing a bad day with a broader month usually makes the result noisier than it needs to be.
Read the total first, then the strongest and lowest support lanes. That combination is usually more useful than the band alone. A midrange total with a very low Recovery rhythm result points to something different from the same total with a quiet Support and orientation lane. One profile suggests trouble resetting after hard moments. The other suggests resilience is weaker because support, meaning, or controllable next moves are harder to access.
A useful trust check is simple: ask whether the lowest lane matches what actually breaks down under pressure. If the page says Steady effort is the weak point but your real difficulty is emotional reset after conflict, revisit the answers before turning the result into a plan.
0 - Not true for me right now to 4 - Consistently true. The progress bar and question list show how much is complete.The total is the anchor because the original CD-RISC-10 idea is still a short resilience measure rather than a full personality profile. The five local lanes are there to explain why the total looks the way it does.
The most useful question is not whether the number is “good.” It is whether the quieter lane matches the place where your resilience actually breaks down. If the weak spot is Support and orientation, the next move is often connection or meaning. If it is Recovery rhythm, the next move is usually faster reset and routine rebuilding.
Example 1: A person scores 28/40. That lands in Working resilience reserve. If Adaptability and Steady effort are strong but Recovery rhythm is the lowest lane, the practical reading is that they can push through disruption but take too long to settle afterward.
Example 2: Another person scores 16/40, which falls in Rebuilding resilience reserve. If the strongest lane is Self-trust but Support and orientation is lowest, the page is describing someone who still believes they can handle difficulty but is not reaching for stabilizing support consistently enough.
Example 3: A repeat run moves from 23 to 26. That crosses a band boundary, but it is still a small shift. The meaningful question is whether the low lane also improved, not just whether the badge changed color.
No. This page uses original proxy wording and keeps itself separate from the licensed questionnaire. The result should not be compared to official normative tables as if it were the same instrument.
The five lanes are local explanation aids built from the ten proxy items. They help show where support is stronger or weaker, but the total remains the main anchor.
Yes, but only if the earlier result came from this same ten-item proxy and you kept the stress window reasonably similar. Comparing unlike situations can create false trends.
Routine scoring happens in the browser. The main privacy caveat is that the response state can be restored from the URL, so copied links can still expose the finished answer pattern.