Brief 60-item HEXACO check-in for your usual personality pattern across familiar situations.

  • Answer for your usual pattern rather than an ideal version of yourself.
  • Most people finish in about 6 to 10 minutes using the five-point agreement scale.
  • Your responses stay only in this browser and are never uploaded.
{{ progressPercent }}%
{{ uxProgressLabel }}
  • {{ question.id }}. {{ questionPreview(question.text) }}
{{ card.label }}
{{ card.value }}
Share result

Share this result page with someone you trust to review your answers and result.

Profile radar
Domain benchmark
Facet snapshot
Facet focus domain: {{ factorMetaByKey[effectiveFacetDomain] ? factorMetaByKey[effectiveFacetDomain].label : 'Top factor' }}.

{{ briefNarrative.primary }}

{{ briefNarrative.secondary }}

What stands out
  • {{ point }}
How to use this profile
  • {{ prompt }}
Suggested next steps
  1. {{ step }}
What not to overread
  • {{ point }}
  • {{ fact }}
Reference context
The benchmark overlay is optional and should be read as orientation rather than ranking.
{{ benchmarkBadgeText }}

{{ benchmarkNarrative.summary }}

{{ benchmarkNarrative.note }}

Reference note: {{ benchmarkSupportText }}

Factor Your mean Reference mean Delta Relative band Copy
{{ row.label }}
{{ row.factorHint }}
 {{ formatScore(row.score) }} {{ row.referenceDisplay }} {{ row.deltaDisplay }} {{ row.relativeBand }}
Facet snapshot
Each facet score is a brief estimate from 2 or 3 items in the 60-item form, so it works best as supporting context for the six main factors.
{{ selectedFacetRows.length }} facets
Facet Score Items Read Copy
{{ row.label }}
{{ row.factorLabel }}
 {{ formatScore(row.score) }} {{ row.itemCount }} {{ row.reading }}
Higher and lower scored item signals
Higher-scored signal Lower-scored anchor Copy
— —
Answer review
Response ledger
This keeps the original statement, chosen response, keyed contribution, factor, and facet together in one exportable table.
{{ answeredCount }}/{{ promptCount }} answered
# Statement Response Scored Factor Facet Copy
{{ row.id }} {{ row.text }} {{ row.answer }}
Reverse-keyed item
 {{ row.scored }}/5 {{ row.factorLabel }} {{ row.facetLabel }}
Tags: Psychology, Psychometrics
16-Factor Personality Profile Assessment Take a 163-item IPIP-style 16-factor profile, see factor means and pole leans, and avoid mistaking it for an official 16PF report.
Big Five Inventory-2 Style Proxy Assessment Map 60 BFI-2-style proxy statements into five domain means and 15 facet scores, with spread checks and answer review for cautious reading.
BFI-2-S Aligned Proxy Assessment Score a 30-item BFI-2-S-aligned IPIP proxy, compare five domain means, and treat two-item facet pairs as directional clues, not norms.
EPQ-R Style PEN Personality Proxy Assessment Take a 28-item EPQ-R-style personality proxy, compare P, E, N, and L scores, and audit keyed answers before sharing the profile.
Customize
Advanced
:

Personality scores are easiest to misuse when they are treated as verdicts instead of descriptions. A HEXACO profile is a structured summary of ordinary tendencies: how a person usually handles fairness, danger, social energy, conflict, order, and curiosity. The point is not to rank someone as good or bad. The point is to give repeated behavior a clearer vocabulary so a result can be compared with real examples from work, study, relationships, or everyday choices.

HEXACO differs from many five-factor summaries because it gives Honesty-Humility its own broad domain. That domain covers sincerity, fairness, modesty, and lower interest in exploiting status or advantage. The model also defines Agreeableness around forgiveness, patience, gentleness, and flexibility when conflict appears. Those two domains should not be collapsed into one general niceness score. Someone may be fair and modest while still being blunt, socially reserved, or slow to compromise.

The six domains are broad enough to be useful but not so broad that every score has one obvious meaning. Emotionality can reflect fearfulness, worry, need for support, and sentimentality. Extraversion covers social self-esteem, boldness, sociability, and liveliness. Conscientiousness includes organization, diligence, perfectionism, and prudence. Openness to Experience includes aesthetic interest, inquisitiveness, creativity, and unconventionality. A single factor score can therefore hide several narrower patterns.

Domain What it asks about Common caution
Honesty-Humility Fairness, sincerity, modesty, and low appetite for unfair advantage. Do not read it as overall moral worth or trustworthiness in every setting.
Emotionality Fear, worry, attachment, support seeking, and sentimental concern. High scores are not a diagnosis; low scores are not proof of fearlessness or indifference.
Extraversion Social confidence, sociability, liveliness, and positive social self-regard. Lower scores often mean lower social appetite, not poor social skill.
Agreeableness Forgiveness, patience, lenience, compromise, and control of anger. High scores do not mean someone should accept unfair treatment or avoid all conflict.
Conscientiousness Order, effort, accuracy, and careful decision making. Very structured habits can help accuracy while feeling rigid in fast-moving work.
Openness to Experience Beauty, knowledge, imagination, creativity, and unusual ideas. Lower scores can reflect practical preference rather than lack of ability.
HEXACO scoring path from response to profile A process diagram showing five-point responses, reverse-keyed item scoring, facet means, and a six-domain HEXACO profile. From answers to a six-domain profile Five-point answer 1 2 3 4 5 Raw response Keyed item 5 -> 1 when reversed Facet means Four facets per domain A broad score summarizes several short facet snapshots; item evidence matters when a result feels surprising.

The 60-item version trades depth for speed. It gives a broad six-domain read from a short form, while each facet rests on only two or three statements. That makes the factor profile more defensible than a fine-grained ranking of every facet. Facets are useful for explaining what may be driving a domain score, not for diagnosing a narrow trait with high precision.

Self-report results also depend on the comparison a person has in mind while answering. A respondent may compare themselves with family members, classmates, colleagues, a recent version of themselves, or an ideal self-image. The most useful interpretation ties the score back to concrete examples and treats major life changes, stress, culture, fatigue, and incentives as context rather than noise.

How to Use This Tool:

Use the assessment as a private self-review of usual behavior. Answer as consistently as possible from ordinary patterns, not from one recent conflict, an unusually good week, or the answer you think would look most acceptable.

  1. Select Start HEXACO-60 assessment and answer each statement on the scale from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree.
  2. Use the progress bar and question navigator to keep the run complete. The profile appears only after all 60 statements have valid answers.
  3. Choose the reflection lens that best matches your use case: general self-review, work and collaboration, relationships and trust, or study and habit design.
  4. Set the benchmark to the overall, women, or men official self-report college sample when a rough reference comparison helps. Turn the reference off when you only want the pattern inside the current run.
  5. Read the summary badges first. Top trait, Lowest trait, Spread, Profile balance, and Facet leader give the broad shape before the detailed tables.
  6. Review Profile radar, Domain benchmark, and Facet snapshot when the summary needs more context. The facet focus defaults to the top factor after a complete run.
  7. Open Higher and lower scored item signals and the Response ledger when a score feels wrong or too strong. Those rows show the item wording, selected response, keyed score, factor, and facet.
  8. Copy links or export CSV, chart images, or DOCX evidence only when you are comfortable sharing the response pattern behind the profile.

Interpreting Results:

Start with the six factor means. A higher mean means the keyed answers leaned toward the high-score description of that HEXACO domain on a 1 to 5 scale. A lower mean means that direction was less endorsed in this response set. Neither end is automatically better. High Emotionality may support care and caution while adding worry under stress. Lower Agreeableness may support firm boundary setting while increasing conflict risk.

  • Top trait and Lowest trait are the clearest broad anchors for the current run.
  • Spread is the highest factor mean minus the lowest factor mean.
  • Profile balance labels that spread as Very even, Moderate spread, or High contrast.
  • Facet leader names the strongest narrow cue, but the 60-item facets are brief snapshots.
  • Domain benchmark compares factor means with the selected college sample mean and standard deviation when a reference is enabled.

Reference rows are not percentiles. A positive delta means the factor mean is above the selected sample mean by the displayed amount. A z-style distance shows that delta in selected-sample standard deviation units. These rows are helpful for orientation, but the underlying comparison is a college self-report sample, not a local hiring pool, clinical norm, relationship standard, or universal population ranking.

Use item evidence before explaining a large contrast. A low Extraversion result driven by Social Boldness and Sociability reads differently from a low result driven mostly by one reverse-keyed item. A high Honesty-Humility result with strong Fairness and Sincerity carries a different story than one where only Greed Avoidance is elevated.

Technical Details:

HEXACO-60 scoring begins with whole-number agreement responses from 1 to 5. Reverse-keyed items are recoded before scoring so that higher keyed values always point toward the named trait direction. This prevents a direct item and an oppositely worded item from pulling a facet in incompatible directions.

Facet means are calculated after recoding, and each HEXACO domain contains four facets. The official scoring key defines factor scale scores as means across all items in a factor. The displayed broad score here averages the four facet means for that domain, which gives each facet equal weight in the visible profile. That is useful for a balanced self-review display, while formal research comparisons should follow the official scoring key exactly.

Formula Core:

Let r be the raw response and s be the keyed score. Direct items keep the raw value. Reverse-keyed items use the same 1 to 5 range in the opposite direction.

si = 6 - ri  for reverse-keyed items facet mean = ∑i=1nsi n displayed factor mean = ∑j=14fj 4

For a reverse-keyed statement, a raw 5 contributes 1, a raw 4 contributes 2, and a raw 3 remains 3. If the three keyed Sincerity items are 5, 2, and 4, the Sincerity mean is 11 / 3 = 3.67. The displayed Honesty-Humility mean then averages Sincerity, Fairness, Greed Avoidance, and Modesty.

Factor Facet set in the 60-item form Higher keyed means usually suggest
Honesty-Humility Sincerity, Fairness, Greed Avoidance, Modesty More genuineness, fairness, modesty, and resistance to unfair advantage.
Emotionality Fearfulness, Anxiety, Dependence, Sentimentality More caution, worry, emotional attachment, and need for support.
Extraversion Social Self-Esteem, Social Boldness, Sociability, Liveliness More social confidence, visible energy, sociability, and positive self-regard.
Agreeableness Forgivingness, Gentleness, Flexibility, Patience More forgiveness, lenience, willingness to compromise, and patience under friction.
Conscientiousness Organization, Diligence, Perfectionism, Prudence More order, sustained effort, detail checking, and careful decision making.
Openness to Experience Aesthetic Appreciation, Inquisitiveness, Creativity, Unconventionality More aesthetic interest, knowledge seeking, imagination, and openness to unusual ideas.

Rule Core:

Local score labels are reading aids for the current response set. They are not official HEXACO cutoffs.

Label Rule How to read it
Higher Mean ≥ 3.80 The high-score direction clearly stands out on the 1 to 5 keyed scale.
Middle Mean > 2.20 and < 3.80 The result is moderate, mixed, or likely to change by context.
Lower Mean ≤ 2.20 The named high-score direction is relatively quiet in this run.
Very even Spread ≤ 0.50 The six factor means are close together.
Moderate spread Spread > 0.50 and ≤ 0.90 The profile has a visible shape without a very large contrast.
High contrast Spread > 0.90 The highest and lowest factors are far enough apart to inspect closely.

Benchmark Logic:

Benchmark comparisons use selected HEXACO-60 self-report college sample means and standard deviations. Delta is the displayed factor mean minus the selected reference mean. The z-style distance divides that delta by the selected reference standard deviation.

delta = factor mean - reference mean z = delta reference SD
Relative band z-style distance rule Meaning
Well above mean z ≥ 1.00 At least one selected-sample standard deviation above the reference mean.
Above mean z ≥ 0.50 and < 1.00 About one-half to one standard deviation above the selected mean.
Near mean z > -0.50 and < 0.50 Within about one-half standard deviation of the selected mean.
Below mean z ≤ -0.50 and > -1.00 About one-half to one standard deviation below the selected mean.
Well below mean z ≤ -1.00 At least one selected-sample standard deviation below the reference mean.

Displayed means and deltas are rounded for readability. Close boundary cases can change labels after a small response change, so repeat comparisons are most useful when the same benchmark, lens, answering context, and facet focus are kept consistent.

Responsible Use Note:

HEXACO-60 output is a self-report personality profile, not a diagnosis, therapy plan, hiring screen, compatibility verdict, admission rule, or certification result. Use it to start reflection and discussion, then check the result against examples from real behavior.

  • Scoring runs in the browser, and answers are not uploaded by the assessment.
  • A copied result link contains the response pattern needed to rebuild the result.
  • CSV files, chart downloads, DOCX exports, screenshots, browser history, and shared links can reveal sensitive self-report answers.
  • Formal research, organizational administration, and non-academic use should follow the official HEXACO materials and permission guidance.

Worked Examples:

A fair profile with quieter social energy

A completed run shows Top trait: H-H 4.12, Lowest trait: X 2.44, and Spread: 1.68. The first reading is high Honesty-Humility with lower Extraversion. A careful note would check Social Boldness and Sociability before calling the person withdrawn, because lower Extraversion can come from social reserve, lower visible energy, or weaker social self-esteem.

A profile with little broad contrast

Another respondent scores between 3.12 and 3.54 across the six factors. The spread is 0.42, so Profile balance reads Very even. That does not mean there is no personality pattern. It means broad domains are close together and the strongest clues may live in the facet snapshot or response ledger.

A reference row that is not a percentile

An Emotionality mean of 4.05 compared with the overall self-report college sample mean of 3.36 gives a delta near +0.69. With a reference standard deviation around 0.70, the z-style distance is just under +1, so the relative band is above mean rather than well above mean. The row gives rough orientation against one sample, not a percentile rank.

A missing result after answering most items

If the progress label says 59/60 answered, the result remains hidden because one statement is blank. Use the navigator to find the item without a completion mark, answer it, and confirm that the summary, charts, benchmark rows, facet snapshot, and response ledger appear.

FAQ:

Is HEXACO-60 a diagnosis?

No. It is a self-report personality profile. It can support reflection, coaching, or research notes, but it should not be used as a clinical diagnosis, treatment guide, or high-stakes decision rule.

How is HEXACO different from a Big Five result?

HEXACO includes Honesty-Humility as a broad factor and defines Agreeableness around patience, forgiveness, gentleness, and flexibility under conflict. Those differences change how fairness, status seeking, anger, and compromise are interpreted.

Are the benchmark rows percentiles?

No. They compare factor means with selected self-report college sample means and standard deviations. They show deltas and broad relative bands, not percentile ranks.

Why are facet scores less stable than factor scores?

Each HEXACO-60 facet uses only two or three items. Facets can explain a broad score, but they should not replace the six factor means or be treated as precise narrow rankings.

Where do my answers go?

Answers are scored in your browser and are not uploaded by the assessment. Shared links and exported artifacts can still reveal your response pattern, so treat them as sensitive.

Why can I not see the full profile?

The profile waits for all 60 valid answers. Check the progress count and question navigator, answer any item without a completion mark, and the result will appear after the final response.

Glossary:

HEXACO
A six-factor personality model covering Honesty-Humility, Emotionality, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience.
Honesty-Humility
The HEXACO domain that covers sincerity, fairness, modesty, and lower attraction to exploiting others or seeking special status.
Factor
One of the six broad personality domains shown as a main profile score.
Facet
A narrower trait group inside a factor, estimated from two or three items in the 60-item form.
Reverse-keyed item
A statement whose raw response is flipped so higher keyed values point toward the named trait direction.
Spread
The difference between the highest and lowest factor means in the current response set.
Reference delta
The displayed factor mean minus the selected sample mean.
z-style distance
The reference delta divided by the selected sample standard deviation.

References: