Check medication-routine friction over the last 3 weeks with a 12-item MAS-style proxy.

  • This uses original proxy wording built around the MAS-12 four-domain structure rather than the source questionnaire text.
  • Use the result to spot routine friction and prepare follow-up questions, not to change medication on its own.
{{ progressPercent }}%
{{ uxProgressLabel }}
  • {{ question.id }}. {{ question.text }}
MAS-12 Medication Adherence Proxy
{{ totalScore }}/60
{{ summarySubline }}
{{ badge.label }}
{{ card.label }}
{{ card.value }}
{{ card.note }}
Medication adherence balance map

The radar shape shows how evenly the four adherence lanes are holding on their keyed 3 to 15 scales. {{ chartLead }}

{{ interpretationLead }}

{{ interpretationSupportLine }}

{{ measurementNote }}

Four adherence lanes
{{ lane.label }}
{{ lane.shortLabel }}
{{ lane.meanLabel }}/5

{{ lane.summary }}

{{ lane.actionHint }}
Friction points to review first

These are the lowest-keyed items in the current profile, so they are the likeliest places where the routine is breaking down.

{{ item.short }}
{{ item.domainLabel }}
{{ item.scoreLabel }}

{{ item.answer }}

{{ item.actionHint }}
Top priorities
  1. {{ item }}
Practical adjustments
  • {{ item }}
Bring into follow-up
  • {{ item }}
When earlier follow-up may help: {{ supportNote }}
Answer review

Review the keyed answer ledger before you export or compare this proxy with a later recheck.

# Lane Prompt Answer Keyed Copy
{{ row.id }} {{ row.laneShort }} {{ row.prompt }} {{ row.answer }} {{ row.scoreLabel }}
JSON

Structured export of the current proxy result, parameters, domain scores, and answered-item ledger.

{{ formattedJson }}
/60
Tags: Psychology , Psychometrics
Export to PDF Fullscreen
:

Medication adherence is more than remembering a pill. Long-term routines hold together only when dose-taking is consistent, questions get brought into clinical conversations, medication information is understood well enough to use, and the regimen fits daily life closely enough to feel repeatable.

This page reflects that broader view with a 12-item MAS-style proxy. It keeps the same four-domain structure used in the published twelve-item Medication Adherence Scale for chronic disease: medication compliance, collaboration with healthcare providers, willingness to access and use medication information, and acceptance or day-to-day fit.

That structure matters because people can miss doses for very different reasons. One person may understand the regimen but resent how disruptive it feels. Another may want to follow it yet hesitate to ask questions or report side effects. Another may mainly struggle when travel, shifts, or a regimen change disrupts a stable routine.

The result is a medication-routine review, not a substitute for clinical advice. A lower score does not tell you which medicine to stop or change. It is a way to spot where the routine is breaking down so the next conversation with a clinician, pharmacist, or caregiver can be more specific.

Technical Details

The proxy uses twelve items scored from 1 - Almost never true for me to 5 - Almost always true. Three items feed each of the four domains. Two items are reverse keyed: the item about stopping or changing medication on your own and the item about feeling daily annoyance at having to keep taking medication.

The total score is the sum of all keyed item values, so the possible range is 12 to 60. Each domain runs from 3 to 15. The page uses local total bands and lane tones rather than clinical cutoffs. That matches the purpose of the tool, which is to show how much routine friction is present rather than to certify adherence as simply good or bad.

Total = ∑ i=1 12 xi
Domain Meaning on this page Range
Medication compliance Dose amount, timing, and avoiding self-directed changes 3 to 15
Collaboration with healthcare providers Bringing questions, preferences, and prior reactions into care conversations 3 to 15
Medication information use Knowing what the medicine is for, what side effects matter, and where to get trusted information 3 to 15
Acceptance and daily-life fit How well the routine fits into daily life without feeling disruptive or resented 3 to 15
Band Lower Upper Interpretation used by the page
High routine friction 12 29 Repeated adherence friction across several lanes
Mixed adherence pattern 30 41 Some supports are present, but one or more lanes still break down too easily
Mostly consistent routine 42 50 The regimen is generally holding, though the weakest lane still deserves active reinforcement
Strong medication routine 51 60 Adherence supports look broad, steady, and integrated into daily life

The page also assigns lane tone from the domain mean: strong at 4.25 or above, solid at 3.5 to 4.24, mixed at 2.5 to 3.49, and high-friction below 2.5. The finished result includes a four-lane radar chart, item-level friction points, suggested adjustments, follow-up prompts, and JSON export. The review lens, dose load, previous total, and recheck interval change interpretation only, not the underlying item scores.

Everyday Use & Decision Guide

The most reliable first pass is to keep the answer frame on the last three weeks, because that is how this page anchors the questions. If your regimen changed very recently, use the alternative lens for interpretation, but still answer according to what has actually happened rather than what you hope will happen.

Read the total band first, then the lowest lane. A high total can still hide one vulnerable lane that needs the real attention. A person can take doses on time while still avoiding questions about side effects. Another can understand the regimen well but feel so burdened by it that the routine slowly erodes on difficult days.

  • Use the dose-load setting to describe how heavy the medication schedule feels in real life, not to change the score.
  • Use the prior-total field only for this same proxy and a similar medication context.
  • Read the Bring into follow-up prompts before the next clinical visit if a lane is clearly lower than the others.
  • Treat any urge to stop, skip, or change medication as a reason to contact a clinician or pharmacist rather than as a self-scoring issue.

A practical trust check is to compare the weakest lane with the real friction you already know. If the page says Information is the weak point but the true problem is that the regimen never fits your schedule, revisit the items before acting on the summary.

Step-by-Step Guide

  1. Answer the twelve items using the last three weeks as the main reference window.
  2. Choose the review lens if you want the narrative framed for a new regimen, active side-effect watch, or a disrupted schedule.
  3. After the last answer, read the total band and the lowest lane before studying the full chart.
  4. Use the radar chart for the four-lane balance, then review the friction-point cards for the items dragging the profile down.
  5. Open the practical adjustments and follow-up prompts before your next medication-related conversation.
  6. Export only if you want a saved record. The page supports chart images, answer-table exports, and JSON.

Interpreting Results

The total band shows how much routine friction is present overall. The lane pattern shows where the friction is concentrated.

  • High routine friction means the regimen is breaking down in several places and needs closer review.
  • Mixed adherence pattern means some supports are present but at least one lane is still too fragile.
  • Mostly consistent routine means the regimen is generally holding, though the quietest lane still deserves reinforcement.
  • Strong medication routine means the current answers suggest broad support across all four lanes, not that follow-up is unnecessary.

Do not treat a higher score as permission to stop checking side effects or skip follow-up. Likewise, do not treat a lower score as proof of noncompliance in every domain. The point is to find which part of the routine is most likely to fail first.

Worked Examples

Example 1: A profile lands in Mostly consistent routine with strong Compliance and Collaboration but lower Fit. That fits someone who is following the regimen yet feeling increasingly burdened by it.

Example 2: Another profile lands in Mixed adherence pattern with lower Information and Collaboration. The practical issue is not only remembering doses. It is that questions and side effects are not getting into the care conversation clearly enough.

Example 3: A person repeats the proxy after a regimen change and the total drops from 49 to 37. The band changes, but the more important follow-up question is which lane fell, because that tells you whether the problem is schedule, communication, understanding, or lifestyle fit.

FAQ

Is this the published MAS-12?

No. It is an MAS-style proxy that keeps the published four-domain structure while using original item wording on the page.

Should I change medication based on this score?

No. Use the result to identify what needs discussion. Do not stop, skip, or change prescribed medication on your own because of a self-report score.

Why include communication and fit instead of only missed doses?

Because long-term adherence often breaks down through misunderstanding, side-effect silence, or poor daily-life fit before it becomes obvious in missed doses.

Are my answers uploaded?

Routine scoring stays in the browser. The main privacy caveat is the restorable response code in the URL and any files you export.

Glossary

Compliance
The lane about taking the prescribed amount on the intended schedule and not changing it on your own.
Collaboration
The lane about bringing questions, preferences, and prior reactions into medication conversations.
Fit
The lane about whether the regimen feels integrated into daily life rather than constantly intrusive.
Routine friction
The page's shorthand for anything making the medication plan harder to sustain reliably.

References