{{ domain.name }}
{{ domain.bandLabel }}{{ domain.narrative }}
Share this result page with someone you trust to review your answers and result.
This radar keeps Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness on the same 1 to 5 proxy-mean scale.
{{ paragraph }}
{{ balanceLead }}
{{ domain.narrative }}
{{ drilldownDomainNarrative }}
| Facet | Mean | Band | Copy |
|---|---|---|---|
|
{{ facet.code }} {{ facet.neoLabel }}
IPIP alias: {{ facet.proxyLabel }}
{{ facet.reading }}
|
{{ formatMean(facet.mean) }}/5 | {{ facet.bandLabel }} |
| # | Domain | Facet | Keying | Statement | Answer | Score | Copy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ row.id }} | {{ row.domain }} |
{{ row.facet }}
IPIP alias: {{ row.alias }}
|
{{ row.keying }} | {{ row.prompt }} | {{ row.answer }} | {{ row.scored }} |
Long personality inventories are useful when a broad Big Five label is too coarse for the question at hand. A person can look high in Extraversion because they enjoy groups, because they speak up easily, because they keep a fast pace, or because they show visible positive emotion. Those signals often travel together, but they are not the same observation.
The NEO-style approach treats personality as five broad domains with six narrower facets inside each domain. The broad domains give the profile a recognizable outline: Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. Facets explain the outline by separating anxiety from vulnerability, warmth from assertiveness, imagination from intellectual curiosity, trust from compliance, and order from self-discipline.
| Term | Plain meaning | Common mistake |
|---|---|---|
| Domain | A broad trait area, such as Neuroticism or Conscientiousness. | Treating one domain as the whole personality story. |
| Facet | A narrower subtrait that explains what is driving a domain. | Assuming all facets inside a domain must be equally high or low. |
| Raw mean | An average on the response scale after reverse-keyed items are corrected. | Reading it as a percentile or official normed score. |
| Proxy inventory | A public-domain item set that approximates a proprietary framework. | Confusing alignment with the official licensed instrument. |
Public-domain IPIP measures make facet-level personality work more accessible because their items and scoring keys can be used without reproducing proprietary NEO PI-R content. That access comes with a tradeoff: a proxy can follow the same domain-and-facet frame, but it does not provide official NEO PI-R items, licensed report language, T-scores, percentile ranks, or professional interpretation rules.
Facet results are most helpful when they slow down overconfident conclusions. A middle domain mean can hide a high facet and a low facet. A high raw mean can reflect a temporary context if the person answered during a demanding week. A low score can be adaptive in one role and costly in another. The numbers are better read as structured prompts for reflection than as fixed labels.
The safest reading is comparative and modest: look for contrasts among the five domains, then check which facets created those contrasts, and keep the limits of self-report in view before using the profile in any important decision.
Set aside about 12 to 18 minutes and answer from your usual pattern, not from one unusually good or bad week.
Read the displayed values as raw proxy means on a 1 to 5 scale. Higher signal, Middle signal, and Lower signal are descriptive bands made from those means, not official NEO PI-R cutoffs, T-scores, percentile ranks, or clinical categories.
The most useful result is usually the contrast among domains plus the facet evidence behind that contrast. A high leading domain deserves a check of its strongest facet, and a quiet domain deserves a check of its quietest facet before you turn the result into a personal label.
A NEO-style proxy score is a keyed average, not a norm-referenced score. Each item begins as a 1 to 5 agreement response. Forward-keyed items keep that response value, while reverse-keyed items are flipped so that higher keyed values point in the same facet direction as the facet label.
The structure is hierarchical. Four keyed items form one facet raw score, six facets form one domain raw score, and the displayed means divide those raw totals back onto the 1 to 5 response scale. This makes domains and facets visually comparable while preserving the fact that a domain rests on 24 items and a facet rests on four.
For each answered item, the keyed score is calculated from the raw agreement response.
Here x is the selected 1 to 5 response and k is the keyed value used for scoring. A reverse-keyed answer of 5 becomes 1, 4 becomes 2, 3 stays 3, 2 becomes 4, and 1 becomes 5.
If one facet has keyed item scores of 5, 4, 4, and 3, its raw score is 16 and its mean is 4.00. If a domain's six facet raw scores sum to 90, the domain mean is 90 / 24 = 3.75, which enters the Higher signal band.
| Domain | Facet codes | Facets | Items | Reverse-keyed item numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroticism | N1 to N6 | 6 | 24 | 8, 12, 16, 18, 19, 20, 24 |
| Extraversion | E1 to E6 | 6 | 24 | 27, 28, 31, 32, 36, 40 |
| Openness to Experience | O1 to O6 | 6 | 24 | 55, 56, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 68, 71, 72 |
| Agreeableness | A1 to A6 | 6 | 24 | 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 95, 96 |
| Conscientiousness | C1 to C6 | 6 | 24 | 102, 103, 104, 107, 108, 111, 112, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120 |
| Output | Rule | How to read it |
|---|---|---|
| Lower signal | Mean <= 2.25. | Lower endorsement of the domain or facet direction. |
| Middle signal | Mean > 2.25 and < 3.75. | Mixed, moderate, or situational endorsement. |
| Higher signal | Mean >= 3.75. | Higher endorsement of the domain or facet direction. |
| Even spread | Top domain mean minus lowest domain mean < 0.45. | The five domain means are close together. |
| Moderate tilt | Spread >= 0.45 and < 0.90. | Some domain contrast is visible, but it is not sharp. |
| Clear tilt | Spread >= 0.90. | The leading domain is separated enough to shape the profile summary. |
This assessment is useful for reflection and structured discussion, but it is still a self-report proxy. It does not replace a licensed instrument, a clinician, or a formal selection process.
A completed profile shows Top trait: Openness to Experience 4.10/5, Lowest trait: Conscientiousness 2.80/5, and Spread 1.30. That is a Clear tilt. The next check is the Facet constellation, because Openness may be led by Ideas, Fantasy, Aesthetics, Values, or another narrower facet.
An Extraversion mean of 3.30/5 stays in Middle signal, but the facet drill-down might show E3 Assertiveness 4.25/5 and E2 Gregariousness 2.10/5. The broad label is moderate, while the facet pattern suggests a person who speaks up more readily than they seek crowded social settings.
A domain mean of 3.74/5 remains Middle signal, while 3.75/5 becomes Higher signal. That one-hundredth point can change the descriptive band, but it should not be read as a professional cutoff.
If the progress text reads 119 / 120 answered and no profile appears, the question navigator is the corrective path. The missing checked icon identifies the unanswered statement that is blocking the Profile, Domain crosswalk, and Answer review.
No. It uses public-domain IPIP-style proxy items aligned to the NEO domain and facet frame. It does not reproduce official NEO PI-R items, norms, or report scoring.
The five domains summarize broad trait areas. The 30 facets show the narrower signals that make each domain high, middle, or low.
Reverse-keyed statements are flipped before scoring. The keying column helps you check whether a surprising scored value came from a reversed statement or from a direct answer.
No. The displayed domain and facet values are raw 1 to 5 proxy means. They are not official percentiles, T-scores, age norms, or licensed report values.
The profile appears only when all 120 items are answered. Use the question navigator and progress count to find the missing response.