{{ domain.name }}
{{ domain.bandLabel }}{{ domain.narrative }}
This radar keeps Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness on the same 1 to 5 proxy-mean scale.
Read the broad shape first, then use the facet constellation and domain drill-down below to see what is driving that shape.
{{ paragraph }}
{{ domain.narrative }}
{{ selectedDomainNarrative }}
| Facet | Mean | Band |
|---|---|---|
|
{{ facet.code }} {{ facet.neoLabel }}
IPIP alias: {{ facet.proxyLabel }}
{{ facet.reading }}
|
{{ formatMean(facet.mean) }}/5 | {{ facet.bandLabel }} |
{{ balanceLead }}
The inner ring shows the five NEO domains and the outer ring shows their 30 official facet labels. Facet slices are labeled by code so the chart stays readable on one screen.
Tooltip details include the official facet name, the public-domain IPIP alias when it differs, and the proxy mean.
Use the export strip to keep the scored answer ledger together with the exact item wording behind this proxy profile.
| # | Domain | Facet | Keying | Statement | Answer | Score | Copy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ row.id }} | {{ row.domain }} |
{{ row.facet }}
IPIP alias: {{ row.alias }}
|
{{ row.keying }} | {{ row.prompt }} | {{ row.answer }} | {{ row.scored }} |
{{ formattedJson }}
This assessment is a public-domain IPIP proxy built to mirror the familiar NEO-style Big Five frame. You answer 120 statements, then the result organizes those answers into the five broad domains of neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness, along with the 30 named facets that sit underneath them.
That makes the page useful when a single top-line Big Five label feels too blunt. A high or low domain score often comes from a smaller cluster of facet-level patterns, such as anxiety inside neuroticism, dutifulness inside conscientiousness, or warmth inside extraversion. This proxy keeps that structure visible instead of flattening everything into one sentence.
The result is descriptive, not diagnostic. It is meant to help with reflection, coaching notes, journaling, or repeat comparison using the same proxy, not to replace a licensed NEO PI-R administration with norm tables and professional interpretation.
The scoring stays on raw proxy means rather than normed T-scores or percentile ranks. Each item is answered on the usual agreement-style scale, reverse-keyed items are flipped where needed, and the tool summarizes the output as domain and facet means on a 1 to 5 scale. That is why the radar and constellation views are best read as shape maps rather than as clinical thresholds.
Two visual summaries do most of the work. The domain radar shows the five broad traits on one shared scale so you can see whether the profile is balanced or sharply tilted. The facet constellation keeps the official 30-facet crosswalk visible, which is useful when a broad domain looks average but one or two facets inside it are pulling strongly upward or downward.
Start with the broad shape, then move downward. If one domain stands out, check whether that domain is being driven by several related facets or by one especially sharp facet. For example, a high neuroticism signal can come from several tension-related facets at once, or from one narrower feature such as vulnerability or self-consciousness doing most of the work.
Repeat comparisons matter more than absolute labels here. If you want to compare two runs, keep the conditions roughly similar by avoiding side-by-side comparisons taken during very different periods of sleep loss, deadline pressure, illness, or acute conflict. That kind of stability makes the profile more interpretable than trying to compare a raw proxy mean with a published norm table from a different instrument.
It also helps to remember what trait scores do not mean. They do not measure worth, honesty, intelligence, employability, or mental health status. They describe a response pattern inside a widely used trait model. The most useful next step is usually practical and specific: review the highest and lowest facets, decide which ones feel stable across settings, and note which ones look more situational.