Quick 14-item check-in for adult health-anxiety patterns using a disclosed proxy rather than restricted official questionnaire wording.

  • Answer for your usual pattern across roughly the past six months, not one isolated illness scare.
  • This is a non-diagnostic self-check, not a medical diagnosis or emergency triage tool.
{{ progressPercent }}%
{{ uxProgressLabel }}
  • {{ question.id }}. {{ question.text }}
SHAS-A adult health anxiety proxy
{{ totalScore }}/42
{{ summarySubline }}
{{ badge.label }}
{{ card.label }}
{{ card.value }}
{{ card.note }}
Health anxiety proxy threshold gauge

This first visual keeps the disclosed 0 to 42 proxy total against the three reference cutoff lenses used in the report.

Start here for the current lane and cutoff distance, then read the interpretation and answer review below.

What this result suggests

{{ interpretationLead }}

{{ cutoffNarrative }}

{{ proxyLead }}

{{ proxySupportLine }}

Cutoff context
Reference line How to read it Current context
{{ row.label }}
{{ row.rangeLabel }}
{{ row.note }} {{ row.currentContext }}
Recommended next actions
  1. {{ action }}
Higher-pressure cues and steadier anchors
Higher-pressure cue Steadier anchor Why it matters
{{ row.driverTitle }}
{{ row.driverNote }}
{{ row.anchorTitle }}
{{ row.anchorNote }}
{{ row.bridge }}
When to seek support

{{ whenToSeekSupportNote }}

/42
Answer review
# Prompt Response Score Area Copy
{{ row.id }} {{ row.prompt }} {{ row.answer }} {{ row.score }}/3 {{ row.domainLabel }}
JSON
{{ formattedJson }}
:

What this health-anxiety proxy is looking for

Health anxiety is not only "worrying about illness." It often shows up as repeated symptom checking, short-lived reassurance, catastrophic interpretations of ordinary sensations, and real interference with attention or plans. This fourteen-item proxy is built to surface those patterns in a compact adult self-check.

The page separates the result into four practical lanes: catastrophic meaning, symptom watching, reassurance loop, and daily interference. That matters because two people with the same total may be struggling in very different ways. One may be spiraling around body sensations. Another may be managing mainly through repeated searches, repeated reassurance requests, or changes in daily behavior.

The tool is a proxy and a screening aid. It does not tell you whether a medical condition is present, and it should never be used to dismiss symptoms that look urgent. If you think you may be having a medical emergency, emergency care comes before any self-report score.

How the total and cutoff lenses work

Each item is scored from 0 to 3, giving a total from 0 to 42. The page keeps three research-aligned cutoff lenses visible because the best threshold depends on the setting. A lighter 18+ lens is useful when you want an early follow-up cue. A 22+ lens is closer to the stronger clinic-style screening line. A 29+ lens is stricter and favors fewer false positives.

The broad read is straightforward. Totals below 18 sit in the lower current signal range. Scores from 18 to 21 sit in a borderline monitoring range. Scores from 22 to 28 sit in an elevated screening range, and scores from 29 upward sit above the stricter high-specificity comparison line. The gauge, cutoff table, domain profiles, and high-pressure item count all work together so the score is not read in isolation.

  • The answer review, chart exports, and JSON record stay in this browser unless you explicitly copy or download them.
  • An optional prior total can be used for simple repeat comparison on the same 0 to 42 frame.
  • The advanced lens changes the framing of follow-up guidance, not the score itself.

How to use the result safely

The most useful next step is usually behavioral. Which items are highest? Are you repeatedly checking the same body site? Does reassurance help only briefly? Are plans changing because symptoms feel dangerous before the situation is clearly urgent? Those patterns are often more clinically useful than the total on its own.

Be careful with false certainty in both directions. A higher score does not prove serious illness, but a lower score does not prove that everything is medically harmless either. Health anxiety and genuine health problems can coexist. That is why the page emphasizes checking loops, reassurance loops, and functional interference rather than pretending the score can settle medical questions.

If the same pattern keeps repeating, bring the total together with the top one or two driver items into therapy or clinician follow-up. That kind of handoff is clearer than saying only "I think I worry too much about my health." It gives the conversation concrete behaviors to review.