| # | Item | Response |
|---|---|---|
| {{ a.id }} | {{ a.text }} | {{ a.answer }} |
Quality of life is a person’s overall view of how well things are going across daily function, mood, relationships, and surroundings. It helps people notice patterns that matter and decide where effort will make the most difference.
A 26 item questionnaire validated by the World Health Organization organizes this view into four areas so results stay comparable over time. This quality of life assessment highlights strengths and needs in plain language that supports practical planning.
You answer each item on a five point scale from not at all to completely while thinking about the past two weeks. Scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale for each area and then combined into a single overall score.
For example, higher results for the physical area and lower for social connections may suggest keeping a steady sleep routine while scheduling meaningful time with others.
Responses reflect perception and can shift with recent events, so try to answer in similar conditions and review trends rather than one off changes.
This tool provides informational estimates and does not substitute professional advice. Results do not constitute a clinical diagnosis.
The assessment measures perceived quality of life across four domains: Physical, Psychological, Social, and Environment. Each item is answered on an ordinal five point scale producing item scores that summarize recent experience over a short recall window.
Computation proceeds in three stages. First, items worded in the negative are reverse coded so higher values always indicate better quality of life. Second, each domain score is the mean of its items, rescaled to 0 to 100 for legibility. Third, the overall score is the simple average of the four domain scores so each domain contributes equally regardless of item count.
Results are read on a 0 to 100 scale where higher numbers reflect better perceived quality of life. A spread between the highest and lowest domain helps judge balance. Small spreads suggest even support across areas, while larger spreads point to uneven experience and clearer priorities.
Comparisons are most trustworthy within the same person over time using the same recall period and response style. Domains have different numbers of items, so the combined score treats domains equally rather than weighting by item count.
| Symbol | Meaning | Unit/Datatype | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
vi |
Raw item response for item i |
1–5 ordinal integer | Input |
si |
Normalized item score after reverse coding | 1–5 ordinal integer | Derived |
md |
Mean of normalized items in domain d |
Real | Derived |
pd |
Domain result rescaled to 0–100 | Percent | Derived |
Qoverall |
Average of the four domain percents | Percent | Derived |
| Balance band | Lower bound | Upper bound | Interpretation | Action cue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced | 0 | 10 | Domains cluster closely. | Maintain habits and track trends. |
| Moderate spread | >10 | 20 | Some unevenness across domains. | Prioritize the lowest domain first. |
| Wide spread | >20 | — | Marked imbalance between domains. | Focus on one specific change. |
| Rule | Detail |
|---|---|
| Scale | Domain and overall results reported on a 0–100 scale. |
| Precision | Results rounded to one decimal place. |
| Decimal separator | Dot character. |
| Rounding method | Standard JavaScript toFixed(1) behavior. |
| Field | Type | Min | Max | Step/Pattern | Error text | Placeholder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Answer choice | Integer | 1 | 5 | Discrete options | — | — |
Encoded state (r) |
String | 26 chars | 26 chars | ^[1-5\-]{26}$ |
Invalid state ignored | — |
| Input | Accepted families | Output | Encoding/precision | Rounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item responses | Five point Likert | Four domain percents and overall | 0–100, one decimal | toFixed(1) |
| State sharing | URL parameter r |
Reconstruction of responses | 1–5 or - per item |
None |
| Answer exports | Clipboard CSV, file CSV, DOCX | Printable table of items and choices | UTF‑8 text, Word document | Not applicable |
Quality of life scoring turns your past two weeks into clear domain results and an overall percent.
Example. If Social is 60 and other domains are near 80, focus one small change on connection and monitor for two weeks.
You finish with a clear snapshot and one practical change to try next.
Processing is browser based and results are rendered locally. Nothing is sent to a server. You may share your encoded state using the r parameter if you choose.
It summarizes self reported experience using a validated 26 item structure. Treat results as a personal snapshot and compare like with like over time.
Domain and overall results are on a 0 to 100 scale with one decimal. Higher is better.
Yes. The calculator works client side. Charts may require cached assets on the first load.
Use Copy CSV or Download CSV, or share the page link containing the r state. Avoid sharing if the content is sensitive.
Values near boundaries can fluctuate with small changes. Look at direction and consistency across weeks before acting.
No purchase is required to use the calculator. The questionnaire text and scoring reflect a widely used WHO validation approach.
r value has 26 characters of 1–5 or -.