{{ interpretationLead }}
No items raised a proxy flag in this run, so the active-cue list is clear.
Every item raised a proxy flag in this run, so there are no quiet anchors to list.
| Lane | Flagged | Density | Read | Copy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ lane.label }} | {{ lane.flaggedCount }}/{{ lane.itemCount }} | {{ lane.densityLabel }} | {{ lane.note }} |
| # | Prompt | Answer | Proxy read | Lane | Copy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ row.id }} | {{ row.text }} | {{ row.answerLabel }} | {{ row.flagLabel }} | {{ row.laneLabel }} |
This route is an educational proxy inspired by the Woodworth Personal Data Sheet, one of the earliest self-report personality and distress questionnaires. It does not reproduce the original full instrument. Instead, it uses a curated 24-item yes or no subset to show how some of those early screening themes cluster when they are read through a modern browser-based result.
The subset is grouped into five editorial lanes: recovery and sleep, body alarms, worry control, suspicion and vigilance, and crowd or space fear. Those are not official WPDS subscales. They are review lenses added to make a historical item set more readable for a modern user.
That means the result should be interpreted carefully. It is not a modern diagnosis, not a validated replacement for current clinical screening, and not a claim about stable personality. It is a structured way to examine how a set of historical distress cues looks when grouped into practical themes.
Each item is keyed as flagged or not flagged, giving a total from 0 to 24. The page then reads that total through simple proxy bands: 0 to 4 as very few flags, 5 to 8 as a light flag load, 9 to 13 as a moderate flag load, 14 to 18 as an elevated flag load, and 19 to 24 as a dense flag load. Those bands are editorial summaries, not historical scoring doctrine.
The radar chart focuses on lane density rather than raw totals alone. That matters because two runs with the same total can look very different. One may concentrate around sleep and body strain, while another may cluster around vigilance or crowd-related unease. The lens controls let you frame the result as a historical screen reading, a modern pattern reflection, or a repeat-check comparison.
Use the strongest lane as the starting point, then read the flagged items inside that lane. The historical item pool is broad and uneven by modern standards, so the total is less useful than the pattern. A moderate total concentrated in sleep disruption and body alarms tells a different story from the same total concentrated in suspicion and crowd-related fear.
The historical lens is best for understanding where the old screeners were looking. The modern pattern lens is usually better if your goal is practical reflection. It shifts attention away from old diagnostic assumptions and toward recognizable present-day themes such as sleep strain, rumination, body alarm, and environmental unease.
If the elevated or dense ranges keep appearing, or if the flagged cues line up with real distress or impairment, use that as the reason to move toward current clinical follow-up rather than trying to extract too much certainty from a historical proxy.