{{ summaryTitle }}
{{ summaryValue }}
{{ summaryLine }}
{{ badge.label }} {{ badge.value }}

{{ summaryAnnouncement }}

Hiring scope and recruiting cost inputs
Both modes use the same cost-per-hire formula.
Costs and hires must cover the same scope.
hires
{{ workflowFeedback }}
%
{{ currencyLabel }}/hire
{{ currencyLabel }}/hire
Cost lineTypeCostPer hireShareBasisCopy
{{ row.label }}{{ row.type }}{{ money(row.cost) }}{{ money(row.per_hire) }}{{ percent(row.share_percent) }}{{ row.note }}
Total recruiting cost{{ money(values.total_cost) }}{{ money(values.cost_per_hire) }}100.0%{{ integer(params.hires_made) }} completed hires
{{ exportAnnouncement }}
{{ section.title }}

{{ section.body }}

{{ exportAnnouncement }}

The denominator decides whether cost per hire says anything useful. Recruiting costs from a quarter, campaign, department, or role group must be divided by the completed hires from that same scope. Mixing a company-wide cost pool with one team's hires can produce a polished number that answers the wrong question.

The numerator is broader than invoices alone. External costs can include advertising, agencies, assessments, checks, candidate travel, events, and allocated recruiting software. Internal costs include the paid time used by recruiters, hiring managers, and interviewers. Organizations may define these categories differently, so the rule used matters as much as the final average.

Cost per hire is most useful for budgeting and comparable trend review. It can show when agency use, interview labor, or sourcing spend is driving a change. It cannot tell whether the resulting hires perform well, stay with the organization, improve diversity, or fill roles quickly enough. Those questions need outcome and process measures alongside cost.

  • Keep the time period, population, completed-hire definition, and cost categories fixed when comparing runs.
  • Allocate shared tools and staff time consistently instead of charging the full amount to whichever campaign is reviewed first.
  • Separate genuinely different hiring work, such as high-volume entry roles and retained executive searches, when one average would hide the difference.

How to Use This Tool:

Define the hiring scope before entering money or hours, then use one cost method throughout the comparison.

  1. Choose Aggregate external and internal totals when costs are already reconciled, or Itemized recruiting cost ledger when the components still need to be built.
  2. Enter Completed hires as a whole number. Costs and hires must cover the same period, campaign, department, or role group.
  3. For aggregate entry, supply the two totals. For itemized entry, add outside spend and the hours and loaded rates for recruiter, hiring-manager, and interviewer labor.
  4. Set Software allocation to the share of entered recruiting software cost that belongs to this scope. The percentage affects itemized mode only.
  5. Add Target cost per hire or Average first-year compensation only when those comparisons are needed. Zero disables the corresponding result.
  6. Review the Cost ledger to confirm the leading category and external/internal split before acting on the average or target variance.

Interpreting Results:

Cost per hire is the average for the selected scope, not the cost of every individual hire. External share and Internal share show how the cost pool is divided. A share of 60% or more is labeled external-led or internal-led; anything between those boundaries is labeled balanced.

A positive Target variance per hire means the result is above the entered target. Savings needed for target expresses that gap across the current number of hires, while Hires needed at target asks how many whole hires would be required to spread the same total cost down to the target. That second value is a mathematical scenario, not evidence that extra hiring demand exists.

The recruiting cost ratio compares total recruiting cost with first-year compensation for the completed hires. It is enabled only when average first-year compensation is greater than zero. Use it as another normalized view of the same cost pool, not as a measure of hiring quality or return on investment.

Technical Details:

Both entry modes feed the same calculation. Aggregate mode accepts one external and one internal total. Itemized mode constructs those totals from outside spending, allocated software, and labor hours multiplied by loaded hourly rates.

Formula Core:

Let E be external recruiting cost, I internal recruiting cost, H completed hires, and T total recruiting cost.

T=E+I cost per hire=TH labor cost=hours×loaded hourly rate allocated software cost=software cost×allocation %100

Each ledger row is also divided by completed hires and by total cost to produce its per-hire value and cost share. When total cost is zero, all shares are reported as zero.

Rule Core:

Cost per hire comparison rules
Derived resultRuleBoundary
Spend mixCompare external and internal sharesExternal-led at external share ≥ 60%; internal-led at internal share ≥ 60%; otherwise balanced
Target variance per hireCost per hire minus targetTarget greater than zero enables the comparison
Savings neededMaximum of zero and target variance multiplied by current hiresNo negative savings value is shown
Hires needed at targetTotal cost divided by target, rounded upward to a whole hireRequires a positive target and positive total cost
Recruiting cost ratioTotal cost divided by average first-year compensation times hires, then multiplied by 100Compensation greater than zero enables the ratio

Amounts are kept at full calculation precision; currency formatting is applied for display. The currency label does not convert values. Completed hires must be an integer from 1 through 1,000,000, and all cost and labor entries must be finite and nonnegative.

Worked Examples:

Itemized campaign above target

An itemized campaign with 7,700 in external cost and 3,930 in internal labor costs 11,630 for two completed hires. Cost per hire is 5,815, and the external share is about 66.21%, so the spend mix is external-led. Against a target of 4,500, the variance is 1,315 per hire and 2,630 across the current hires. Spreading the same cost over three hires would bring the average at or below that target.

References: