{{ summaryTitle }}
{{ summaryValue }}

{{ summaryLine }}

{{ badge.label }} {{ badge.value }}
{{ summaryAnnouncement }}
Meeting record inputs
Keep it specific enough for people to find later.
The browser keeps this value local and uses it in the generated record.
The selection changes the document label while preserving the recorded facts.
One concise outcome-oriented sentence is usually enough.
One person per line; optional roles make the attendance record easier to scan.
Summarize substance rather than writing a transcript.
Capture the outcome and accountable owner, not the full debate.
Give each task one accountable owner and a due date when known.
This appears in the document footer and circulation review.
Keep confidential details out of public channels.
Optional context for the meeting details section.
Useful for formal minutes and follow-up questions.
Optional attendance context for stakeholder or committee records.
Leave blank when no follow-up meeting is planned.
Draft is the conservative default and does not claim attendee approval.
{{ textExportAnnouncement }}
{{ values.minutes_markdown }}
{{ chartExportAnnouncement }}
{{ tableExportAnnouncement }}
GateStatusReview noteCopy
{{ row.gate }}{{ row.status }}{{ row.note }}

Introduction:

Minutes preserve the decisions and commitments that survive after a meeting ends. A useful record lets someone who was absent identify the meeting, understand why it happened, see what the group decided, and find the owner and due date for each follow-up task.

That purpose separates minutes from a transcript. A transcript tries to reproduce speech, while minutes reduce the conversation to meeting business. Personal notes may include impressions or reminders that matter only to the writer. Circulated minutes need neutral wording, enough context to explain outcomes, and a clear distinction between discussion, decisions, and actions.

The main parts of useful meeting minutes and the questions they answer.
Record partQuestion it answersCommon failure
Meeting identityWhich meeting was this, and when did it happen?A vague title that cannot be found later.
AttendanceWho took part, and in what role?Names without roles when authority or ownership matters.
Discussion summaryWhat context explains the outcome?A near-transcript that hides the conclusion.
Decision logWhat was approved, deferred, or rejected?Recording opinions as settled decisions.
Action itemsWho will do what, and by when?Shared ownership or missing due dates.

The appropriate level of detail depends on the meeting. A short team review may only need a purpose, key outcomes, and dated actions. Client or project minutes need enough context to stand outside the original conversation. Formal committees may also require motions, vote counts, abstentions, quorum, or approval procedures that a general-purpose record cannot infer.

Minutes are evidence that information was recorded, not proof that every statement is correct. Names, dates, owners, due dates, approval state, and distribution should be checked by a person who understands the meeting. Confidential discussion and credentials should be removed or handled under the organization's access rules before circulation.

How to Use This Tool:

Write one meeting record at a time and structure the rough notes before treating the output as ready to circulate.

  1. Enter the Meeting title, actual Date and time, purpose, and attendees. Put one attendee on each line and add a role after a pipe, tab, or spaced dash when the role matters.
  2. Summarize each discussion topic on its own line. Use pipe-separated topic, summary, and outcome fields when you want the clearest table.
  3. Record decisions and actions separately. A complete action row uses owner, task, due date, status, and optional context.
  4. Add the minute taker and distribution list, then choose the approval state. Optional facilitator, location, apologies, and next-meeting details strengthen formal records.
  5. Review all eight circulation checks. Resolve every Needs work item and assess each Review item before copying the minutes.

Interpreting Results:

Ready means the corresponding check found the expected information. Review marks an omission or condition that may be acceptable but deserves a decision. Needs work identifies missing meeting basics, attendance, core content, or action ownership that should be corrected before circulation.

The summary can show Ready to circulate only when all eight checks are Ready. Review items produce Ready with review notes, while any Needs work item produces Core details needed. These labels measure record completeness under the stated rules; they do not approve the minutes or verify facts.

Technical Details:

Structured minutes require two distinct operations. Rough lines must first be separated into meeting records, then the complete record must pass a circulation review. The process is deterministic and does not invent missing owners, dates, decisions, or context.

Transformation Core

Each non-empty line becomes one record. Pipes take precedence as separators, tabs are accepted next, and simpler fallback patterns handle spaced dashes or colons where appropriate.

Meeting note record layouts and their output fields.
Source lineStructured fieldsFallbacks
AttendeeName, roleParticipant when no role is supplied
DiscussionTopic, summary, outcomeGenerated topic label or “No explicit outcome recorded”
DecisionDecision, owner, status, contextUnassigned, Recorded, or No extra context
ActionOwner, action, due, status, contextUnassigned, No due date, Open, or No extra context

Decision wording recognizes Approved, Deferred, and Rejected terms; otherwise it preserves the supplied status or uses Recorded. Action wording similarly recognizes Done, Blocked, In progress, and Deferred. These keyword matches organize the record but cannot determine what the group actually agreed.

Rule Core

Eight gates produce the circulation status. Needs work outranks Review, and Review outranks Ready.

Meeting minutes circulation review rules.
GateReady conditionReview or Needs work condition
Meeting basicsTitle and date/time are presentNeeds work when either is missing
Attendance recordAt least one attendeeNeeds work when empty
Purpose and contentPurpose plus discussion, decisions, or actionsReview when content exists without purpose; otherwise Needs work
Discussion summaryAt least one topicReview when empty
Decision logAt least one decisionReview when empty, including meetings with no decisions
Action accountabilityEvery action has owner, task, and due dateNeeds work for an unassigned owner; Review for no actions or missing due dates
Circulation pathMinute taker and distribution list are presentReview when either is missing
Sensitive data checkNo obvious credential wording detectedReview when a simple pattern finds secret-like terms

The final Markdown includes meeting details, purpose, discussion, decisions, action items, follow-up cues, and the preparer's name. Empty record groups are written as not recorded rather than silently removed. Text containing pipes is escaped so it stays inside the intended table cell.

Privacy Notes:

Meeting text is processed in the browser and is not sent to a server by the generator. The sensitive-data check only looks for a small set of credential-like words and patterns. It can miss personal, commercial, legal, or security-sensitive information, so a human must review the complete record and distribution list before sharing.

Worked Examples:

Action without a due date

An action entered as Ben | Verify importer patch is kept, but its due date becomes No due date. Action accountability is marked Review. Adding 2026-09-04 as the third field removes that specific review condition.

No decisions were made

Leaving the decision list empty produces a Review item because an omitted decision can be accidental. Entering a clear “No decisions” record makes the absence explicit and gives later readers a reliable account of the meeting outcome.